Iran, US fail to reach agreement in marathon talks in Pakistan
The New Arab5 hrs
Vance Leaves Pakistan as US-Iran Talks Collapse
Did America's greed torpedo the Iran talks or did Tehran reject a fair deal and invite devastating consequences?
Above: JD Vance speaks during a news conference in Islamabad, Pakistan, on April 12, 2026. Image credit: Jacquelyn Martin/Pool/Getty Images
The Spin
Pro-Iran narrative
America's excessive demands torpedoed the Islamabad talks — pushing for control of the Strait of Hormuz and removal of nuclear materials, goals it couldn't achieve through war. Iran's delegation held firm for 21 hours, protecting the nation's sovereign rights against unreasonable ultimatums. The failure rests entirely on Washington's greed and bad faith, not on any unwillingness on Tehran's part to reach a fair deal.
Pro-Trump narrative
Iran walked away from America's final and best offer after 21 hours of good-faith negotiations, and now faces devastating consequences. A naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz would strangle Tehran's oil revenues and crush an already collapsing economy. Maximum pressure — sanctions, military resolve and diplomatic isolation — is the only language this regime understands, and the U.S. holds every card.
Anti-Trump narrative
It was never a genuine negotiation; rather, it was Trump trying to get his demands met, as hours after the Islamabad talks collapsed, he floated a naval blockade of Iran, echoing his Venezuela playbook. But this time, the stakes are global. Iran's grip on the Strait of Hormuz means any blockade could trigger retaliation, risking economic shockwaves. As JD Vance spoke vaguely of commitments, the world braces for escalation that no one could fully control.
Metaculus Prediction
Public Figures
The Controversies
Establishment split
CRITICAL
PRO
© 2026 Improve the News Foundation. All rights reserved.Version 6.18.0
© 2026 Improve the News Foundation.
All rights reserved.
Version 6.18.0