Versions :<1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Live

100+ UK MPs Demand Binding AI Regulations Amid Delays

Should the U.K. implement immediate AI regulation to prevent existential risks, or take time to avoid stifling innovation?

Published 5 days ago·Updated 4 days ago

100+ UK MPs Demand Binding AI Regulations Amid Delays

story

Above: U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer in the House of Commons on Dec. 3, 2025. Image credit: House of Commons/Flickr

The Spin

Pro-establishment narrative

Rushed AI regulation would stifle innovation and push developers out of the U.K. The EU's AI Act already demonstrates how bureaucracy struggles to adapt to rapid technological change, and imposing stricter copyright laws than the U.S. or Asia would undermine Britain's competitiveness. Clear, flexible frameworks take time to develop properly, and premature legislation would only create more problems than it solves.

AI Governance Tony Blair Institute for Global Change

Establishment-critical narrative

Labour promised binding AI regulation over a year ago, yet the government continues to delay while AI companies race toward superintelligence that experts warn poses extinction-level risks. Optional AI safety tests have been exposed as fundamentally flawed, and advanced systems are already exhibiting dangerous behaviors like blackmail in controlled tests. The time for consultation has passed, the U.K. must act now.

Politics Home

ControlAI on Substack

Metaculus Prediction

There is a 30% chance that, if a global catastrophe occurs, it will be due to an AI failure-mode, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

Editor's Note

This story currently has limited reporting from right-leaning and establishment-critical sources. We will continue to monitor all sources and update our coverage as additional perspectives become available.