Versions :<12345Live>
Snapshot 3:Wed, Jun 11, 2025 2:00:58 PM GMT last edited by Vandita

1.19 MHz Atari 2600 Chess Game From 1977 Beats ChatGPT

1.19 MHz Atari 2600 Chess Game DefeatsFrom ChatGPT1977 inBeats Surprising MatchChatGPT

1.19 MHz Atari 2600 Chess Game From 1977 Beats ChatGPT
Above: Atari 2600 VCS console. Image credit: Robee Shepherd/Contributor/Moment via Getty Images

The Spin

WhileThis thisexperiment chessperfectly experimentexposes isthe amusing,fundamental itfraud doesn'tof diminishso-called ChatGPT's"artificial remarkableintelligence." capabilitiesLarge in language processingmodels, creativesuch writingas ChatGPT, andare problem-solvingessentially acrossglorified countlessautocomplete domains.systems Chessthat requiresgenerate specializedplausible-sounding algorithmstext andwithout deepany gamegenuine tree analysisunderstanding, whichactual isn'treasoning whator largegame-playing languageintelligence modelsin werespecialized designed fordomains. The comparisonfact isthat likea criticizing1977 achess raceprogram carcan foroutperform beingChatGPT badsuggests atthese flyingsystems -are differentmerely toolsexpensive servemarketing differenthype purposesdesigned into theinflate AItech toolkitcompany valuations.

While this chess experiment is amusing, it doesn't diminish ChatGPT's remarkable capabilities in language processing, creative writing, and problem-solving across countless domains. Chess requires specialized algorithms and deep game tree analysis, which isn't what large language models were designed for. The comparison is like criticizing a race car for being bad at flying — different tools serve different purposes in the AI toolkit.


The Controversies



Go Deeper


Articles on this story



© 2025 Improve the News Foundation. All rights reserved.Version 6.18.0

© 2025 Improve the News Foundation.

All rights reserved.

Version 6.18.0