This decision is a necessary step to protect personal data and uphold privacy rights under data protection laws. Courtsdesk was found to have handled sensitive information improperly, risking the dignity and safety of victims, defendants and others in the justice system. Prioritizing compliance with legal safeguards outweighs the convenience of an external archive, especially when official channels for court access remain available.
Destroying the Courtsdesk archive eliminates evidence of systemic court failures rather than fixing them. The platform exposed that 1.6 million hearings had no press notice and official listings matched reality only 4.2% of the time. Ordering deletion after journalists used this data to report on grooming gangs and other cases shows institutions hide accountability when transparency becomes politically inconvenient.
© 2026 Improve the News Foundation.
All rights reserved.
Version 6.18.0