DOJ Tries First Alien Terrorist Case in 30-Year History

Is this a vital shield against mass casualty threats or a constitutional time bomb waiting to explode?

Published 3 days ago

story

Above: The E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse in Washington, D.C., on April 27. Image credit: Celal Gunes/Anadolu/Getty Images

The Spin

Pro-Trump narrative

Activating the Alien Terrorist Removal Court is exactly the kind of decisive action needed to protect Americans from threats like Nazira Haji Zada, a foreign national who backed an ISIS-inspired Election Day massacre plot. This court exists precisely for cases where classified evidence can't be exposed in standard proceedings without compromising national security. Terrorists who exploit U.S. residency to plot mass casualties deserve removal, and this administration is finally using every legal tool available.

FOX News

Trump Department of Justice on X

Anti-Trump narrative

Reviving a court that sat dormant for 30 years raises serious constitutional red flags. Withholding classified evidence from defense counsel strikes at the core of due process, and the presiding judge herself signaled discomfort with the government's approach. This is a "zombie court," not a mass deportation tool, and its use will almost certainly trigger years of constitutional litigation similar to post-9/11 military tribunal battles. The administration is building this court as it goes, and that's a shaky foundation for justice.

The New York Times

Nicolette Glazer on X