These cyberattacks are clear attempts to undermine international justice and accountability. The timing during NATO's summit and the sophisticated nature suggest that state-sponsored actors are targeting the court's critical work prosecuting war crimes. The ICC's mandate to hold powerful leaders accountable makes it a natural target for those seeking to escape justice.
The ICC has overstepped its bounds by targeting democratic allies like Israel while ignoring real human rights abusers. These cyber incidents highlight the court's vulnerability and questionable legitimacy when it pursues politically motivated cases against nations that don't recognize its jurisdiction. The sanctions are justified responses to judicial overreach.