Die Zeit

Umwelt: Reichstes Zehntel verursacht Umweltschden in Billionenhhe

LaPresse

Les plus riches ont un poids  considrable  sur la destruction de la nature

El País

El 10 Que Mas Consume Es Responsable De Billones De Euros En Dano Ambiental Una Mayoria Esta Pagando El Estilo De Vida De Otros.Html

Guardian

Mega-consumers of food and energy cost environment $5.7tn a year, study finds

Mirage News

Top 10% Cause $5.7T in Environmental Damage Yearly

Nature

Environmental damages of the top ten percent consumers exceed global climate and biodiversity funding gaps

The Asia Business Daily

Gizmodo

Top 10% of Consumers Create Up to $5.7 Trillion in Environmental Damage Annually

Eurekalert

1132137

Business Standard News

Top 10 Consumers Cause 5 7 Trn In Environmental Damage Annually Study 126061900600_1.Html

Los Angeles Times

Editorial: Wealthy countries are responsible for climate change, but it’s the poor who will suffer most

jasonhickel

Center for Global Development

Emissions Myth Buster We All Know Developed Countries Are Responsible Climate Change Right

psantacl

Metaculus

Will there be at least 2˚C of global warming by 2100?

Charles III

Donald Trump

Elon Musk

Joe Biden

Nancy Pelosi

Xi Jinping

Rishi Sunak

Kamala Harris

Justin Trudeau

Narendra Modi

Bill Gates

Pope Francis

Janet Yellen

Emmanuel Macron

Olaf Scholz

Angela Merkel

Yuval Noah Harari

António Guterres

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Barack Obama

Kofi Annan

Michael Mann

James Inhofe

Greta Thunberg

David Attenborough

Giorgia Meloni

Patrick Michaels

Jane Goodall

Bjorn Lomborg

Freeman Dyson

"[C]limate change is just a very, very expensive form of tax."

"I believe in climate change caused by human beings. What I'm skeptical about is the glib notion that it means the end of the world as we know it."

"The clock is no longer just ticking, it is banging."

"There is no long-term prosperity without action on climate change."

"The time for seeking global solutions [to climate change] is running out."

"The climate crisis is the existential threat. That's not hyperbole; it's a fact."

"[W]e are killing our planet."

Climate change is "above all, an existential crisis."

"Climate change is one of the greatest challenges mankind faces."

"If we don't take action, the collapse of our civilisations and the extinction of much of the natural world is on the horizon."

"Humanity is on thin ice — and that ice is melting fast."

"We haven't yet exceeded the bounds of viable human civilisation, but we're getting close."

Is Climate Change an Existential Threat?

Simon Stiell

Jim Skea

World Meteorological Organization

Myles Allen

Sheldon Whitehouse

"At this point it is virtually certain we will blow through [the 1.5C] target."

'"On our current path... we will reach that 1.5-degree limit sometime in the 2030s."

"Without immediate and deep emissions reductions across all sectors, it will be impossible [to limit global warming to 1.5C]"

"We are still nowhere near the scale and pace of emission reductions required to put us on track toward a 1.5C world."

We won't have "extreme cases like of 4 degrees [Celsius] warming," but will "miss the 2-degree goal."

"[C]utting our emissions in half in 10 years only gives us a 50% chance of staying below 1.5 degrees."

Keeping global warming to 1.5C is "entirely doable" and "simply a matter of political willpower."

Will Global Warming Be Limited to 1.5°C or "Well Below" 2°C?

A study published in Communications Sustainability on Thursday found that the world's top 10% of consumers cause between $1.7 trillion and $5.7 trillion in environmental damage annually, exceeding global climate financing commitments.

A study published in Communications Sustainability on Thursday found that the world's top 10% of consumers cause between $1.7 trillion and $5.7 trillion in environmental damage annually, exceeding global climate financing commitments.

The research, conducted by the universities of Oxford and Leiden, also found that over 60% of the world's top 10% of consumers live in the U.S. and EU, with more than half of the U.S. population falling into this category.

The research, conducted by the universities of Oxford and Leiden, also found that over 60% of the world's top 10% of consumers live in the U.S. and EU, with more than half of the U.S. population falling into this category.

Biodiversity loss accounts for 47-56% of the total environmental damage bill, while climate change accounts for 36-45%, making them the two largest categories of environmental damage identified in the study.

Biodiversity loss accounts for 47-56% of the total environmental damage bill, while climate change accounts for 36-45%, making them the two largest categories of environmental damage identified in the study.

According to the research, per-person environmental damage costs for the top 10% in the U.S. range from $19,000 to $63,000 annually, compared to $410 to $1,400 for the top 10% in India.

According to the research, per-person environmental damage costs for the top 10% in the U.S. range from $19,000 to $63,000 annually, compared to $410 to $1,400 for the top 10% in India.

The study's figures are considered conservative, covering only four of nine planetary boundaries and excluding investment-linked emissions, which account for roughly half of top earners' environmental impact.

The study's figures are considered conservative, covering only four of nine planetary boundaries and excluding investment-linked emissions, which account for roughly half of top earners' environmental impact.

The researchers used the Environmental Prices Handbook 2024 alongside consumption-based footprint data to assign monetary values to environmental damage, drawing on consumption figures from 2017.

The researchers used the Environmental Prices Handbook 2024 alongside consumption-based footprint data to assign monetary values to environmental damage, drawing on consumption figures from 2017.

Die Zeit #

LaPresse #

El País #

Guardian #

Mirage News #

Nature #

The Asia Business Daily #

Gizmodo #

Eurekalert #

Business Standard News #

Los Angeles Times #

Center for Global Development #

Metaculus #

A study published in Communications Sustainability found that the world's top 10% of consumers cause between $1.7 trillion and $5.7 trillion in environmental damage annually, exceeding global climate financing commitments.

A study published in Communications Sustainability found that the world's top 10% of consumers cause between $1.7 trillion and $5.7 trillion in environmental damage annually, exceeding global climate financing commitments.

Researchers from Oxford and Leiden universities found that over 60% of the world's top 10% of consumers live in the U.S. and EU, with more than half of the U.S. population falling into this category.

Researchers from Oxford and Leiden universities found that over 60% of the world's top 10% of consumers live in the U.S. and EU, with more than half of the U.S. population falling into this category.

Biodiversity loss accounts for 47-56% of the total environmental damage bill, while climate change accounts for 36-45%, making them the two largest contributors identified in the study.

Biodiversity loss accounts for 47-56% of the total environmental damage bill, while climate change accounts for 36-45%, making them the two largest contributors identified in the study.

Per-person environmental damage costs for the top 10% in the U.S. range from $19,000 to $63,000 annually, compared to $410 to $1,400 for the top 10% in India.

Per-person environmental damage costs for the top 10% in the U.S. range from $19,000 to $63,000 annually, compared to $410 to $1,400 for the top 10% in India.

The richest 10% of consumers are driving climate destruction while the world's poorest bear the consequences — that's not just unfair, it's a moral catastrophe. Millionaires alone are on track to burn 72% of the remaining 1.5C carbon budget, and wealthy nations have repeatedly broken their climate finance pledges. The global North owes a debt to the South, and half-measures won't cut it.

The richest 10% of consumers are driving climate destruction while the world's poorest bear the consequences — that's not just unfair, it's a moral catastrophe. Millionaires alone are on track to burn 72% of the remaining 1.5C carbon budget, and wealthy nations have repeatedly broken their climate finance pledges. The global North owes a debt to the South, and half-measures won't cut it.

Jason Hickel

Blaming developed nations for nearly all of climate change is a myth — Annex II countries account for just 37-41% of cumulative emissions since 1850, far below what most people assume. Degrowth schemes pitched as climate justice have a track record of crushing the poor, while actual economic growth pulled 800 million people out of extreme poverty. Scapegoating the wealthy won't solve the climate — broad, honest accountability will.

Blaming developed nations for nearly all of climate change is a myth — Annex II countries account for just 37-41% of cumulative emissions since 1850, far below what most people assume. Degrowth schemes pitched as climate justice have a track record of crushing the poor, while actual economic growth pulled 800 million people out of extreme poverty. Scapegoating the wealthy won't solve the climate — broad, honest accountability will.

Pedro Santa Clara

There is a 98% chance there will be at least 2˚C of global warming by 2100, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

There is a 98% chance there will be at least 2˚C of global warming by 2100, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

AI: Environmental Impacts

Climate Change

Australia Election Issue: Climate Change

Canadian Election Issue: Climate

UK Elections: Environment

David McNew/Getty Images

Study: Top 10% Consumers Cost Earth $5.7 Trillion in Damage Annually

David McNew/Getty Images

Study: Top 10% Consumers Cost Earth $5.7 Trillion in Damage Annually

Economic conditions & trends

Environment

Pollution

The richest 10% of consumers are driving climate destruction while the world's poorest bear the consequences — that's a moral catastrophe. Millionaires alone are on track to burn 72% of the remaining 1.5°C carbon budget, and wealthy nations have repeatedly broken their climate finance pledges. The global North owes a debt to the South, and half-measures won't cut it.

The richest 10% of consumers are driving climate destruction while the world's poorest bear the consequences — that's a moral catastrophe. Millionaires alone are on track to burn 72% of the remaining 1.5°C carbon budget, and wealthy nations have repeatedly broken their climate finance pledges. The global North owes a debt to the South, and half-measures won't cut it.

Blaming developed nations for nearly all climate change is a falsehood. Annex II countries account for just 37-41% of cumulative emissions since 1850, far below what most people assume. Degrowth schemes pitched as climate justice have a track record of crushing the poor, while actual economic growth has pulled 800 million people out of extreme poverty. Scapegoating the wealthy won't solve the climate issue, but a focus on sustainable growth will help the most economically vulnerable.

Blaming developed nations for nearly all climate change is a falsehood. Annex II countries account for just 37-41% of cumulative emissions since 1850, far below what most people assume. Degrowth schemes pitched as climate justice have a track record of crushing the poor, while actual economic growth has pulled 800 million people out of extreme poverty. Scapegoating the wealthy won't solve the climate issue, but a focus on sustainable growth will help the most economically vulnerable.

Study: Top 10% of Consumers Cost Earth $5.7 Trillion in Annual Damage

Study: Top 10% of Consumers Cost Earth $5.7 Trillion in Annual Damage

allaboutai

arxiv

arxiv.org

carbon-pulse

cell-press

cleanhub

congress

cumminsinc.

cybernews

deloitteinsights

earth.org

environmental-and-energy-study-institute

epri

euronews

euronews-

Forbes

google

harvardbusinessreview

ieee-spectrum

livenowfromfox

medium

mitnews

nature

prnewswire

Reuters

sciencemediacentre

the-times-of-india

thetimesofindia

thewashingtonpost

true-north-leadership

unep

unitar

youtube

Ukraine

troops

aljazeera

american-security-project

carbon-brief

carbonbrief

climate-watch-data

climateactiontracker

commonslibrary

copernicus

dailymail

effective-altruism-forum

eki-energy-services-limited

european-commission

europeancommission

gallup.com

gridlocked

homo-economicus

in-due-course

ipcc

journals

MSNBC

nasascience

nationalgeographic

nypost

onlinelibrary

Study: Top 10% of Consumers Cost Earth $5.7 Trillion in Annual Damage

Study: Top 10% of Consumers Cost Earth $5.7 Trillion in Annual Damage Annually

The Spin

Metaculus Prediction

The Controversies

Trump

Michaels

Harris

Sunak

Francis

Biden

Macron

Thunberg

Merkel

Attenborough

Guterres

Mann

Whitehouse

Guterres

Skea

Stiell

Gates

Thunberg

Mann

Go Deeper

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Study: Top 10% of Consumers Cost Earth $5.7 Trillion in Annual Damage

Study: Top 10% of Consumers Cost Earth $5.7 Trillion in Annual Damage Annually

The Spin

Metaculus Prediction

The Controversies

Trump

Michaels

Harris

Sunak

Francis

Biden

Macron

Thunberg

Merkel

Attenborough

Guterres

Mann

Whitehouse

Guterres

Skea

Stiell

Gates

Thunberg

Mann

Go Deeper

Sign Up for Our Free NewslettersSign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters