Freezing Iraq’s funds risks further destabilizing Baghdad rather than solving the militia problem — a blunt Trump-era pressure tactic that overlooks how Iran-aligned PMF factions are deeply embedded in the state, draw government salaries and operate beyond central control. Financial coercion ends up punishing a government for actions it cannot realistically control or contain on its own. Squeezing Iraq this way ultimately risks handing Tehran exactly the opening it needs to reassert influence.

Washington’s push to freeze Iraq’s funds exposes a pattern of external control overriding Iraqi sovereignty, echoing the post-2003 order shaped by the U.S.-led invasion, just as Baghdad edgesmoves closer to a breakthrough in government formation breakthrough. UsingFinancial financial chokeholds whilepunish armed factions remain structurally embedded in the state punishes the country without addressing the underlying system, turning economic policy into blunt geopolitical leverage. This kind of pressure risks derailing fragile progress and reinforcing the very instability it claims to prevent.