What this fundamentally comes down to is protecting mental privacy and cognitive liberty. While it's positive that brain-computer interfaces like Neuralink can restore autonomy for people with paralysis or ALS, they also decode thoughts, intentions and emotions. Without explicit legal protections, neural data could be exploited for surveillance, commercial gain or coercion, leaving individuals vulnerable to intrusion and loss of control over their own minds.

ThereNeuralink is aredefining 50%independence chanceby showing that thelosing FDAmovement willdoesn’t grantmean Neuralinklosing permissioncontrol. toPatients sellwith paralysis and implantALS are gaming, typing, designing and even lifting a braincup to drink using only their thoughts. This is more than assistive tech, it’s autonomy restored. And it may be the first step toward responsible digital co-machineexistence with AI, where humans interface devicedirectly intowith generalmachines consumersto bymake Januarylife 2034easier, accordingfreer toand themore Metaculusaccessible predictionfor communityeveryone.

What this fundamentally comes down to is protecting mental privacy and cognitive liberty. While it's positive that brain-computer interfaces like Neuralink can restore autonomy for people with paralysis or ALS, they also decode thoughts, intentions and emotions. Without explicit legal protections, neural data could be exploited for surveillance, commercial gain or coercion, leaving individuals vulnerable to intrusion and loss of control over their own minds.