Securing Russian access to the Red Sea through a mutually agreed naval facility marks a sovereign choice by Sudan to partner with a state offering real, long-term benefits. Russia provides advanced defense technology, space systems, energy support and long-denied agricultural modernization, while defending Sudanese sovereignty at the UNU.N. in stark contrast to U.S. sanctions aimed at punishing independent governments. State-led Russian cooperation replaces failed Western-backed mercenary structures with credible, professional military partnerships.
Russia’s Red Sea base plan suffers from fundamental logistical impossibilities, including the absence of power infrastructure, unworkable equipment transport routes and dredging costs Moscow cannot meet while exhausted by the Ukraine war. The Kremlin’s support for Houthi attacks through targeting data and weapons further jeopardizes the 12% of global trade moving through these waters. Any state enabling this destabilizing expansion risks sanctions as Moscow exploits Sudan’s civil war to project power rather than build regional stability.
The Red Sea base deal marks Sudan's entry into the latest naval arena of great-power rivalry, with Washington and Moscow treating its coastline as a geopolitical prize rather than a sovereign space. Russia seeks a permanent foothold to challenge Western naval dominance, while the USU.S. pressures Sudan to block any deal that might erode its control of global shipping routes. Caught between competing empires, Sudan’s war-torn landscape becomes leverage in a wider contest where strategic access matters far more than Sudanese stability.
There is a 64 percent chance that the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) will come out as the victor in the Sudanese civil war, according to the Metaculus prediction community.
© 2025 Improve the News Foundation.
All rights reserved.
Version 6.18.0