First and foremost, no fishermen would besail sailing on a submersible — these men were indeed narcoterrorists attempting to smuggle fentanyl into the U.S — but keeping them in the U.S. would have several legal issues, including the need to turn over sensitive information and the risk of them being granted asylum in the U.S. Given that all valuable information has already been extracted from them, it's better to let them return home and tell their experience.

ThereRecent developments related to the repatriation of the survivors speak volumes about the nature of the Trump administration's aalleged 45%war chanceon thatcartels. If they were actual narcoterrorists in an armed conflict with the U.S.., willthey attackwould Venezuelabe beforeworthy 2026,of accordingprosecution to— and would not be treated like common deportees. That this comes as the MetaculusU.S. predictionSouthern communityCommand chief has announced his retirement only raises more questions.

First and foremost, no fishermen would sail on a submersible — these men were indeed narcoterrorists attempting to smuggle fentanyl into the U.S — but keeping them in the U.S. would have several legal issues, including the need to turn over sensitive information and the risk of them being granted asylum. Given that all valuable information has already been extracted from them, it's better to let them return home and tell their experience.