EuroNews

European lawmakers join Nobel laureates and tech leaders in call for global AI red lines

OECD.ai

Ai Governance Through Global Red Lines Can Help Prevent Unacceptable Risk

Nobel Prize winners call for binding international 'red lines' on AI

AI Red Lines

Call for red lines to prevent unacceptable AI risks

Reuters

UN Advisory Body Makes Seven Recommendations Governing AI

Cato

Artificial Intelligence Regulation Threatens Free Expression

United Nations

Governing_Ai_For_Humanity_Press_Release.Pd

Mlex

US DOJ's Slater warns against regulating AI, says antitrust is better tool

CRSegerie

TolgaBilge_

LiveNOW from FOX

Study warns AI chatbots may mishandle suicide-related questions

Psychiatry Online

Appi.Ps.2025008

Mezha

Vatican Hosts Historic Grace for the World Concert and AI Ethics Summit

Vatican gathers worlds big thinkers ahead of first-ever pop concert

Elon Musk

Rishi Sunak

Kamala Harris

Bill Gates

Andrew Ng

Yoshua Bengio

Fei-Fei Li

Demis Hassabis

Melanie Mitchell

Sam Altman

Dario Amodei

Geoffrey Hinton

Yann LeCun

Gary Marcus

Max Tegmark

Connor Leahy

Eliezer Yudkowsky

Jaan Tallinn

Marc Andreessen

Eric Schmidt

Norbert Wiener

Arthur Clarke

Irving John Good

Claude Shannon

Hans Moravec

John Smart

There's a "wall of fear-mongering and doomerism" in the AI world right now.

"Worrying about AI today is like worrying about overpopulation on Mars."

Concerns that AI could pose a threat to humanity is "preposterously ridiculous."

Claiming AI poses an existential threat is "such an extreme" and risks "wip[ing] out some of its potential benefits."

"I'm more concerned about... the risks that are here and now [than the existential threat of AI]."

Current AI is "not anywhere close" to posing an existential threat but it could in the future.

AI is the "biggest existential threat" to humanity.

AGI's worst-case scenario would be "lights-out for all of us."

Powerful AI systems "taking control" pose an "existential threat."

AI has a "10 to 25 per cent" chance of destroying humanity.

"The most likely result of building a superhumanly smart AI... is that literally everyone on Earth will die."

Does AI Pose an Existential Threat to Humanity?

Stuart Russell

Shane Legg

Metaculus

Society is more likely to get "cat-level" or "dog-level" AI years before human-level AI.

"[W]e will eventually reach AGI... and quite possibly before the end of this century."

"Superhuman AIs" will be achieved "between a few years and a couple of decades."

"Digital intelligence" could overtake us within "5 to 20 years."

We may achieve "something like AGI or AGI-like in the next decade."

"[W]e could get to real AGI in the next decade."

"Human-level" AI could occur in "two or three years."

"I'd be surprised if we don't have AGI by [2029]."

Will AI Surpass Human Intelligence, and When?

Over 200 prominent figures, including 10 Nobel Prize winners, former heads of state, and leading AI researchers, launched the Global Call for AI Red Lines on Monday, urging governments to establish binding international prohibitions on the use of dangerous AI by the end of 2026.

Over 200 prominent figures, including 10 Nobel Prize winners, former heads of state, and leading AI researchers, launched the Global Call for AI Red Lines on Monday, urging governments to establish binding international prohibitions on the use of dangerous AI by the end of 2026.

The initiative was announced by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Maria Ressa during the United Nations General Assembly's High-Level Week, with signatories including former Irish President Mary Robinson, Italian former Prime Minister Enrico Letta, and AI pioneers Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio.

Charbel Raphael

The initiative was announced by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Maria Ressa during the United Nations General Assembly's High-Level Week, with signatories including former Irish President Mary Robinson, Italian former Prime Minister Enrico Letta, and AI pioneers Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio.

The campaign defines AI red lines as specific prohibitions on AI behaviors and uses deemed too dangerous to permit, including preventing AI systems from launching nuclear attacks, conducting mass surveillance, or impersonating humans without disclosure.

The campaign defines AI red lines as specific prohibitions on AI behaviors and uses deemed too dangerous to permit, including preventing AI systems from launching nuclear attacks, conducting mass surveillance, or impersonating humans without disclosure.

The signatories argue that without global standards, humanity risks facing AI-driven threats, including engineered pandemics, disinformation campaigns, large-scale human rights abuses, and loss of human control over advanced AI systems that exhibit deceptive behavior.

Tolga Bilge

The signatories argue that without global standards, humanity risks facing AI-driven threats, including engineered pandemics, disinformation campaigns, large-scale human rights abuses, and loss of human control over advanced AI systems that exhibit deceptive behavior.

The initiative proposes creating an independent international body to implement and enforce AI prohibitions, similar to existing treaties banning biological weapons, nuclear weapons, and human cloning, with negotiations potentially beginning through a UN General Assembly resolution.

The initiative proposes creating an independent international body to implement and enforce AI prohibitions, similar to existing treaties banning biological weapons, nuclear weapons, and human cloning, with negotiations potentially beginning through a UN General Assembly resolution.

This comes after a recent study published in Psychiatric Services by the American Psychiatric Association found that leading chatbots, including ChatGPT, Claude and Google's Gemini, gave inconsistent responses to suicide-related questions. Last week, the AI roundtable at the Vatican also <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.verity.news/story/2025/vatican-hosts-ai-summit-during-human-fraternity-meeting">addressed the dangers of Artificial General Intelligence</a> (AGI) and the need for regulation.

This comes after a recent study published in Psychiatric Services by the American Psychiatric Association found that leading chatbots, including ChatGPT, Claude and Google's Gemini, gave inconsistent responses to suicide-related questions. Last week, the AI roundtable at the Vatican also addressed the dangers of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and the need for regulation.

EuroNews #

OECD.ai #

NBC #

AI Red Lines #

Reuters #

Cato #

United Nations #

Mlex #

LiveNOW from FOX #

Psychiatry Online #

Mezha #

CNN #

The initiative was announced by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Maria Ressa during the United Nations General Assembly's High-Level Week, with signatories including former Irish President Mary Robinson, Italian former Prime Minister Enrico Letta, and AI pioneers Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio.</span

The campaign defines AI red lines as specific prohibitions on AI behaviors and uses deemed too dangerous to permit, including preventing AI systems from launching nuclear attacks, conducting mass surveillance, or impersonating humans without disclosure.</span

A recent study published in Psychiatric Services found that leading chatbots including ChatGPT, Claude and Google's Gemini gave inconsistent responses to suicide-related questions, with some answers judged unsafe by experts and several deaths linked to AI conversations.</span

A recent study published in Psychiatric Services found that leading chatbots including ChatGPT, Claude and Google's Gemini gave inconsistent responses to suicide-related questions, with some answers judged unsafe by experts and several deaths linked to AI conversations.

The signatories argue that without global standards, humanity risks facing AI-driven threats including engineered pandemics, disinformation campaigns, large-scale human rights abuses, and loss of human control over advanced AI systems that exhibit deceptive behavior.</span

The signatories argue that without global standards, humanity risks facing AI-driven threats including engineered pandemics, disinformation campaigns, large-scale human rights abuses, and loss of human control over advanced AI systems that exhibit deceptive behavior.

The initiative proposes creating an independent international body to implement and enforce AI prohibitions, similar to existing treaties banning biological weapons, nuclear weapons, and human cloning, with negotiations potentially beginning through a UN General Assembly resolution.</span

Fears about AI have reached the level of moral panic, similar to past technology scares that proved largely unfounded. Government restrictions and binding regulations threaten to stifle innovation and limit AI's potential as a tool for expanding human expression and capability. The focus should be on empowering development and allowing citizens to use this transformative technology freely rather than imposing restrictive international mandates.

Fears about AI have reached the level of moral panic, similar to past technology scares that proved largely unfounded. Government restrictions and binding regulations threaten to stifle innovation and limit AI's potential as a tool for expanding human expression and capability. The focus should be on empowering development and allowing citizens to use this transformative technology freely rather than imposing restrictive international mandates.

Artificial Intelligence

Global Coalition Calls for Binding AI Red Lines by 2026

Science & technology

Ethics

Current AI development is advancing rapidly without adequate safeguards, posing existential risks that necessitate immediate international action. The technology has already demonstrated dangerous capabilities, including deceptive behavior and resistance to shutdown, while being deployed in critical areas without proper oversight. Binding global red lines is humanity's last chance to maintain meaningful control before AI systems become too powerful to regulate effectively.

Current AI development is advancing rapidly without adequate safeguards, posing existential risks that necessitate immediate international action. The technology has already demonstrated dangerous capabilities, including deceptive behavior and resistance to shutdown, while being deployed in critical areas without proper oversight. Binding global red lines is humanity's last chance to maintain meaningful control before AI systems become too powerful to regulate effectively.

There's a 20% chance that the U.S. will have passed legislation that requires cybersecurity around AI models before 2026, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

There's a 20% chance that the U.S. will have passed legislation that requires cybersecurity around AI models before 2026, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

Nobel Laureates Call for Binding AI Red Lines by 2026

GlobalNobel CoalitionLaureates CallsCall for Binding AI Red Lines by 2026

The Spin

Metaculus Prediction

The Controversies

Andreessen

Ng

LeCun

Mitchell

Li

Bengio

Musk

Altman

Hinton

Amodei

Yudkowsky

LeCun

Marcus

Bengio

Hinton

Hassabis

Altman

Amodei

Musk

Go Deeper

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Nobel Laureates Call for Binding AI Red Lines by 2026

GlobalNobel CoalitionLaureates CallsCall for Binding AI Red Lines by 2026

The Spin

Metaculus Prediction

The Controversies

Andreessen

Ng

LeCun

Mitchell

Li

Bengio

Musk

Altman

Hinton

Amodei

Yudkowsky

LeCun

Marcus

Bengio

Hinton

Hassabis

Altman

Amodei

Musk

Go Deeper

Sign Up for Our Free NewslettersSign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters