The chemical weapons determination and sanctions are a necessary response to escalating atrocities by Sudan's military, which has engaged in indiscriminate bombing of civilian infrastructure, including schools, markets, and hospitals while using food deprivation as a weapon of war. Moreover, accusing Washington of taking sides is ridiculous, as the RSF was also sanctioned. The government's refusal to participate in peace talks shows its commitment to military solutions over negotiations.
The sanctions timing and chemical weapons claims are politically motivated to distract from recent Congressional campaigns against UAE involvement in the Sudan conflict, with the U.S. neglecting to pursue a proper investigation by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. The move undermines Sudan's legitimate fight against paramilitary forces that threaten national stability and reflects the bipartisan U.S. strategy of control by promoting destruction and chaos.
ThereThe ischemical weapons determination and sanctions are a 60.9%necessary chanceresponse thatto theescalating Sudaneseatrocities Armedby ForcesSudan's (SAF)military, willwhich comehas outengaged in indiscriminate bombing of civilian infrastructure, including schools, markets, and hospitals while using food deprivation as a weapon of war. Moreover, accusing Washington of taking sides is ridiculous, as the victorRSF was also sanctioned. The government's refusal to participate in thepeace Sudanesetalks civilshows war,its accordingcommitment to themilitary Metaculussolutions predictionover communitynegotiations.
The sanctions timing and chemical weapons determinationclaims and sanctions are apolitically necessarymotivated response to escalatingdistract atrocitiesfrom byrecent Sudan'sCongressional military,campaigns whichagainst hasUAE engagedinvolvement in indiscriminatethe bombingSudan of civilian infrastructureconflict, includingwith schools,the markets,U.S. andneglecting hospitalsto whilepursue usinga foodproper deprivationinvestigation asby athe weaponOrganization offor war.the Moreover,Prohibition accusingof WashingtonChemical ofWeapons. takingThe sidesmove isundermines ridiculous,Sudan's aslegitimate thefight RSFagainst wasparamilitary alsoforces sanctioned.that Thethreaten government'snational refusalstability toand participatereflects inthe peacebipartisan talksU.S. showsstrategy itsof commitmentcontrol toby militarypromoting solutionsdestruction overand negotiationschaos.
There is a 60.9% chance that the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) will come out as the victor in the Sudanese civil war, according to the Metaculus prediction community.