Israel sees this moment as a critical window of opportunity to neutralize Iran's nuclear threat while it's weakened. Any deal that allows Iran to maintain enrichment capabilities poses an existential danger that must be prevented through military action if necessary. The Begin Doctrine requires taking preemptive action against nuclear threats before they fully materialize.

Israel cannot afford to wait and rely on diplomatic agreements that may only temporarily restrict Iran's nuclear capabilities. Given Iran's weakened state and degraded air defenses, there is a critical window of opportunity to eliminate the existential threat posed by its nuclear program through decisive military action. The Begin Doctrine requires preventing hostile states from obtaining nuclear weapons before it's too late.

DiplomaticA negotiationsdiplomatic offersolution theremains bestviable pathand forwardpreferable to peacefullymilitary limitaction, with Iran's nuclearshowing activities.willingness Militaryto strikesnegotiate woulddespite onlychallenging minimallyconditions. setThe backIranian thenuclear program whileis riskingintended afor broaderpeaceful regionalpurposes, conflict.and IranTehran hasmaintains its legitimate rightsright to peacefulenrich nuclearuranium technology under international law,. andMilitary astrikes negotiatedwould agreementonly withtemporarily strictset monitoringback wouldthe beprogram morewhile effectiverisking thana militarybroader actionregional in preventing weapons developmentconflict.

Diplomatic negotiations remainoffer the best path forward, asto militarypeacefully strikeslimit wouldIran's risknuclear broaderactivities. regionalMilitary conflictstrikes andwould only temporarilyminimally set back Iran'sthe nuclearprogram programwhile risking a broader regional conflict. Iran has legitimate rights to peaceful nuclear technology under international law, and demandsa fornegotiated completeagreement dismantlementwith arestrict unrealistic.monitoring Thewould focusbe shouldmore beeffective onthan verifiablemilitary limitsaction andin monitoringpreventing weapons development.

MilitaryDiplomatic negotiations remain the best path forward, as military strikes would berisk dangerouslybroader destabilizingregional conflict and likelyonly ineffectivetemporarily atset permanently setting back Iran's nuclear program. DiplomaticIran negotiationshas offerlegitimate therights bestto pathpeaceful forward,nuclear withtechnology pollsunder showinginternational 69%law ofand Americansdemands preferfor acomplete negotiateddismantlement agreementare limitingunrealistic. Iran'sThe programfocus toshould peacefulbe purposeson underverifiable strictlimits and monitoring rather than military action that risks regional war.