United States of America

Trump Admin Subpoenas NYT Journalists Over Air Force One Reporting

Was the NYT's Air Force One report a vital act of press freedom or a reckless breach of national security?

1 day ago·Updated 16 hours ago

Trump Admin Subpoenas NYT Journalists Over Air Force One Reporting

story

Above: Trump disembarks from Air Force One upon arrival at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, on July 9. Image credit: Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

The Spin

Anti-Trump narrative

Federal agents showing up at journalists' homes to deliver grand jury subpoenas is a direct assault on press freedom. The DOJ's move to compel NYT reporters to testify — and reveal their sources — over a story about Air Force One security gaps is exactly the kind of government intimidation the First Amendment was designed to prevent. Reporting on how taxpayer dollars fund a president's security is legitimate journalism, not a crime.

Committee to Protect Journalists The Associated Press

Kenneth Roth on X

Pro-Trump narrative

Publishing details about Air Force One's alleged missing antimissile capabilities — while Trump was abroad near Iranian-aligned adversaries — wasn't courageous journalism, it was reckless. The FBI explicitly asked the Times not to run the story on national security grounds, and the paper refused. Forcing reporters to reveal those responsible for leaks that endangered a sitting president is a reasonable use of grand jury authority.

New York Post

The Last Refuge on X