The Hassan-Putin summit marks a renewed 65-year partnership, with bilateral trade up 25% and major investments in mining, energy and agriculture under discussion. Tanzania's nonaligned foreign policy allows Dar es Salaam to choose partners based on national interest rather than Western approval. Russia's historic support for African liberation movements and continued economic engagement make the partnership a logical and sovereign choice for Tanzania.
Hassan's Moscow trip is a pivot away from Western accountability. Russia doesn't ask hard questions about election massacres or tortured activists, making it a refuge for a government accused of killing 518 of its own people. Western sanctions and frozen E.U. funding exist for good reason, and closer ties with Putin deepen Tanzania's isolation from democratic partners. Swapping human rights standards for uranium deals and wheat imports is a bad trade for Tanzanians.
Washington's outrage over Tanzania has little to do with human rights and everything to do with politics. The U.S. has backed authoritarian governments and abusive partners whenever strategic interests were at stake. Tanzania only became a problem once Dar es Salaam pursued a more independent foreign policy. Human rights concerns may be real, but presenting them as a main driver of U.S. policy ignores a long history of selective outrage and double standards.
© 2026 Improve the News Foundation.
All rights reserved.
Version 7.4.1