Science & technology

NASA Chief Wants Pluto Reinstated as a Planet

Does Pluto deserve reinstatement as a planet or is it a Kuiper Belt Object correctly reclassified?

Published 15 hours ago

NASA Chief Wants Pluto Reinstated as a Planet

story

Above: Pluto as seen from the New Horizons spacecraft in 2015. Image credit: Heritage Space/Heritage Images/Getty Images

The Spin

Narrative A

The IAU's 2006 decision to strip Pluto of planetary status was made by fewer than 5% of its members and rests on a "clearing orbit" standard that no planet in the solar system actually meets. Pluto has mountains, glaciers, an underground ocean, organic compounds and multiple moons — making it more geologically active than Mars. An unelected foreign body shouldn't get to erase an American scientific achievement.

Abe Hamadeh on X Daily Mail

Narrative B

Pluto isn't a demoted planet — it's a Kuiper Belt Object, one of countless icy remnants left over from the solar system's formation. Reclassifying it as a planet would be scientifically backwards; the 2006 IAU definition exists precisely because discoveries revealed a far richer solar system than anyone previously understood. Pluto's dwarf planet status is a scientific upgrade, not an insult.

Forbes International Astronomical Union

Establishment-critical narrative

While NASA leadership argues about "making Pluto a planet again," federal science is being gutted. Proposed cuts to NASA's science budget threaten to halve funding and cancel dozens of missions, including planetary research. Reopening classification debates serves as a distraction from collapsing advisory structures and shrinking scientific capacity needed to study Pluto at all.

Adeene Denton on Bluesky Social Nature