JPMorgan Confirms Closing Over 50 Trump Accounts in 2021

Was Trump debanked due to political weaponization or legitimate risk concerns after Jan. 6?

Published 4 hours ago

JPMorgan Confirms Closing Over 50 Trump Accounts in 2021

story

Above: JPMorgan Chase chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on Jan. 21, 2026. Image credit: Fabrice Coffrini/AFP/Getty Images

The Spin

Pro-Trump narrative

JPMorgan closed Trump's accounts under direct pressure from Biden administration banking regulators who weaponized vague "reputational risk" rules to target conservatives after Jan. 6. The same bank that kept Jeffrey Epstein as a client for years after his 2008 conviction suddenly found a sitting president unsuitable, revealing politically motivated debanking that threatened anyone with heterodox views.

Mario Nawfal on X New York Post

Anti-Trump narrative

Trump's lawsuit against JPMorgan is thin and likely to be dismissed. Banks like JPMorgan closed his accounts due to legitimate risk concerns after he incited a Capitol riot and attempted to overturn an election, not political bias. Financial institutions had long considered Trump a risky prospect due to his business failures, and Jan. 6 only amplified reasonable concerns about reputational and legal exposure.

Atlantic Bloomberg

Cynical narrative

Isn’t it interesting how the bank that debanked Trump in 2021 now has Jamie Dimon praising his NATO, China and immigration takes while exploring Board of Peace deals and funding “Trump accounts”? It’s almost like President Trump was speaking the truth all along and everyone else just needed a few years to catch up. Funny how “too risky” turns into “right all along” once it’s safe to admit it.

MJTruthUltra on X Financial Times CNBC

Narrative D

JPMorgan’s admission it closed Trump’s accounts casts its reputational risk policies into the spotlight. Investors and regulators will scrutinize how consistently the bank applies rules for high-profile, politically sensitive clients, while corporate confidence could wobble if governance appears uneven. The case may prompt clearer policies, shaping market perceptions of JPMorgan’s risk discipline going forward.

Simply Wall St