Versions :<12345678Live

Jack Smith Defends Trump Probes in First Public Testimony

Did Smith legitimately expose Trump's crimes or weaponize the DOJ to spy on Congress and target political enemies?
Jack Smith Defends Trump Probes in First Public Testimony
Above: Jack Smith testifies before the House Judiciary Committee on Jan. 22, 2026. Image credit: Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

The Spin

Anti-Trump narrative

Smith successfully obtained multiple indictments with proof beyond a reasonable doubt and would have secured convictions at trial if Trump hadn't delayed proceedings until re-election. The investigation was legitimate and necessary, exposing Trump's attempts to overturn the 2020 election that Americans witnessed firsthand on Jan. 6. House Republicans are manufacturing fake conspiracies to cloud the truth and protect Trump.

Pro-Trump narrative

Smith weaponized the DOJ by secretly subpoenaing House Speaker Kevin McCarthy just 16 days into his tenure, falsely labeling him a flight risk and spying on Congress members while knowing it violated constitutional protections. The $35 million investigation enriched Smith's team through taxpayer-funded salaries for targeting political enemies. Smith admitted using novel legal theories to spy on members he never planned to charge, banking on secrecy to avoid accountability.

Metaculus Prediction



The Controversies



Go Deeper


Establishment split

CRITICAL

PRO



© 2026 Improve the News Foundation. All rights reserved.Version 6.18.0

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation.

All rights reserved.

Version 6.18.0