Lawsuits

DOJ Defends $1.8B 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' in Senate Hearing

Is this a corrupt slush fund for rioters and donors or a lawful remedy for government overreach?

Published 5 days ago

DOJ Defends $1.8B 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' in Senate Hearing

story

Above: Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on May 19. Image credit: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

The Spin

Democratic narrative

The $1.8 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" is a brazen, taxpayer-funded slush fund set up for Trump with zero accountability — violent Jan. 6 rioters could get paid, campaign donors could cash in, and the public may never know who gets what. Blanche even refused to rule out payments to people convicted of assaulting police officers during the insurrection. This is corrupt self-dealing dressed up in legal language.

Chris Coons on X Intelligencer Mother Jones

Republican narrative

The Anti-Weaponization Fund is a lawful, structured process to redress real abuses of government power for anyone. Even Hunter Biden can apply, and Trump's family gets zero money from it. There's clear legal precedent — the Obama administration created a similar $760 million fund — and any unspent money reverts to the federal government, unlike Keepseagle, where leftover funds went to groups that never even filed claims.

Todd Blanche on United States Department of Justice

Eric Daugherty on X