Versions :<123456Live

Democrats Introduce Bill to End Sex Trafficking Time Limits

Should statutes of limitations be eliminated to ensure justice or preserved to protect constitutional rights?
Democrats Introduce Bill to End Sex Trafficking Time Limits
Above: U.S. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) at a news conference to introduce Virginia's Law on Feb. 10, 2026. Image credit: Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg/Getty Images

The Spin

Narrative A

Sexual predators have hidden behind wealth, power and the clock for far too long — banking on survivors staying silent while statutes of limitations shield abusers from accountability. Trauma delays disclosure, and justice cannot be held hostage to arbitrary calendars. Ending these time limits ensures that those who committed these crimes don't get to run out the clock on facing consequences.

Narrative B

This bill may be well-intentioned, but it could face challenges based on precedent. Previously, the Utah Supreme Court ruled such statutes violate due process by retroactively eliminating defendants' vested rights in expired limitation periods. And the U.S. Supreme Court in Stogner v. California held that reviving time-barred prosecutions violates the Ex Post Facto Clause, calling such retroactivity "unfair" and "dishonest."



The Controversies



Go Deeper


Articles on this story



© 2026 Improve the News Foundation. All rights reserved.Version 6.18.0

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation.

All rights reserved.

Version 6.18.0