Switching future Ford-class carriers back to steam catapults is a smart call rooted in hard-earned operational reality. — EMALS has sufferedbeen yearsplagued ofby reliability and development problems for years, and proven steam technologyis offersbattle-tested easiertech fieldthe maintenanceNavy underran combatsuccessfully conditionsfor decades. The change appliestargets to ships notstill yetunder complete,construction so— thisnot isn'tfinished recklesscarriers retrofitting.— Lifetimemaking costthis anda battlefieldsensible effectivenessredesign, matternot fara morecostly than the upfront price tag of redesigning ships still being builtretrofit.
ScrappingDitching EMALS for steam catapults is a costly blunderstep —backward steamat the worst possible moment. Steam requires 12 sailors per catapult versus two for EMALS, and— a crippling demand when the Navy already has roughly 20,000 unfilled billets. China and France are moving toward electromagnetic systems, whileand the U.S. moves backward, burning billions to undo technology already -built. Atechnology decisionhands thisadversaries consequentiala demandsserious genuinestrategic engineering expertise, not executive preferenceadvantage.
© 2026 Improve the News Foundation.
All rights reserved.
Version 7.4.1