Versions :<123456Live>
Snapshot 4:Thu, Aug 13, 2026 5:40:48 AM GMT last edited by Mr Bot

Journal Retracts COVID Excess Deaths Study Over Misinformation

Journal Retracts COVID Excess Deaths Study Over Misinformation

Image credit: 

The Spin


This retracted paper twisted excess mortality data to smear vaccines, misquoted studies on autoimmune risk, buried real-world evidence showing vaccines saved over a million lives in Europe, and lifted data from other scientists without credit. Journals cannot let junk science with plagiarized numbers pose as legitimate research just because it gets picked up by anti-vaccine crowds. Retraction was two years late but absolutely warranted.

Nothing was wrong with the methodology, data or analysis in this paper, yet the BMJ yanked it anyway over a vague complaint about the discussion being unbalanced. That call came only after media coverage annoyed editors, not during peer review, proving this was a political retraction dressed up as science. Bowing to outside pressure like this sets a dangerous precedent for research everywhere.

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation. All rights reserved.Version 7.4.1

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation.

All rights reserved.

Version 7.4.1