Guardian

Man who stabbed Salman Rushdie in 2022 convicted of federal terrorism charges

Man convicted in federal terrorism trial over stabbing of author Salman Rushdie

pranesh

Metaculus

Non State Actor Develops A Nuke By 2030

MehrTarar

sarahemclaugh

ali_cgn

LadyVelvet_HFQ

NDTV

Author Salman Rushdies Attacker Hadi Matar Convicted On Terrorism Charges 11840729

The Telegraph

Hadi Matar Stabbed Salman Rushdie Convicted Terror Charges

CTV News

Salman Rushdie stabbing: Man convicted in terrorism trial

Le Monde.fr

Client Challenge

The Washington Times

Man convicted in terrorism trial over the 2022 stabbing of author Salman Rushdie

The New York Times

Hadi Matar Salman Rushdie Terror.Html

The Times (UK)

Verifying Device

The Times of Israel

Us Jury Convicts Man On Terror Charges For Stabbing That Gravely Wounded Salman Rushdie

BBC News

Salman Rushdie attacker convicted of terror offences

Themardanwala

A federal jury in Buffalo, New York, convicted Hadi Matar, 28, on Wednesday of transnational terrorism and providing material support to Hezbollah for the 2022 stabbing of author Salman Rushdie.

A federal jury in Buffalo, New York, convicted Hadi Matar, 28, on Wednesday of transnational terrorism and providing material support to Hezbollah for the 2022 stabbing of author Salman Rushdie.

Matar is already serving a 25-year New York state prison sentence for attempted murder in the attack. His federal sentencing is scheduled for Nov. 3, when he faces a potential life term.

Matar is already serving a 25-year New York state prison sentence for attempted murder in the attack. His federal sentencing is scheduled for Nov. 3, when he faces a potential life term.

Prosecutors argued Matar was motivated by a 1989 fatwa issued by Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini calling for Rushdie's death over his novel "The Satanic Verses." Iran has denied involvement in the attack.

Prosecutors argued Matar was motivated by a 1989 fatwa issued by Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini calling for Rushdie's death over his novel "The Satanic Verses." Iran has denied involvement in the attack.

Evidence presented at trial included private notes in which Matar wrote "We need to kill him ASAP" and messages from 2021 and 2022 in which he tracked Rushdie's many public appearances.

Evidence presented at trial included private notes in which Matar wrote "We need to kill him ASAP" and messages from 2021 and 2022 in which he tracked Rushdie's many public appearances.

Rushdie testified at the trial, telling jurors he was stabbed 15 times and lost sight in his right eye. "I can't say what his ambitions or his aim was, but the wounds were dispersed across my body," he said.

Rushdie testified at the trial, telling jurors he was stabbed 15 times and lost sight in his right eye. "I can't say what his ambitions or his aim was, but the wounds were dispersed across my body," he said.

Defense attorney Nathaniel Barone argued the government had no proof of Matar's state of mind and that he acted independently, without coordination or control from Hezbollah. Matar declined to testify.

Defense attorney Nathaniel Barone argued the government had no proof of Matar's state of mind and that he acted independently, without coordination or control from Hezbollah. Matar declined to testify.

Guardian #2724

NBC #

Metaculus #

NDTV #

The Telegraph #

CTV News #

Le Monde.fr #

The Washington Times #

The New York Times #

The Times (UK) #

NPR #

The Times of Israel #

BBC News #

While violent attacks are never justified, Salman Rushdie bears responsibility for scrutiny and accountability due to his deliberate provocation of religious communities through writings widely perceived as mocking sacred beliefs. Free speech does not extend to unrestricted insult of faiths.

While violent attacks are never justified, Salman Rushdie bears responsibility for scrutiny and accountability due to his deliberate provocation of religious communities through writings widely perceived as mocking sacred beliefs. Free speech does not extend to unrestricted insult of faiths.

Kamran

Pranesh Prakash

Justice has affirmed free speech: Words, however offensive, are not knives. Rushdie wrote a book decades ago; Matar chose violence. If free speech means anything, it is protecting the right to offend — and the blame for a stabbing belongs solely with the one who stabbed, never the one who wrote.

Justice has affirmed free speech: Words, however offensive, are not knives. Rushdie wrote a book decades ago; Matar chose violence. If free speech means anything, it is protecting the right to offend — and the blame for a stabbing belongs solely with the one who stabbed, never the one who wrote.

Mehr Tarar

Sarah McLaughlin

There is a 0.5% chance that a non-state actor will develop their own nuclear weapon by 2030, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

There is a 0.5% chance that a non-state actor will develop their own nuclear weapon by 2030, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

Freedom of Speech

Jonathan Brady/PA Images/Getty Images

Salman Rushdie Attacker Convicted in Terrorism Trial

Jonathan Brady/PA Images/Getty Images

Rushdie Attacker Convicted of Terrorism

Freedom of speech & expression

Violent crime

Violence & assaults

Justice has affirmed free speech. Rushdie wrote a book while Matar chose violence. If free speech means anything, it is protecting the right to offend. This conviction affirms that Rushdie and his works were never on trial, and this terror attack was motivated by Iran's fatwa.

Justice has affirmed free speech. Rushdie wrote a book while Matar chose violence. If free speech means anything, it is protecting the right to offend. This conviction affirms that Rushdie and his works were never on trial, and this terror attack was motivated by Iran's fatwa.

While violent attacks are never justified, Rushdie must still answer for his works. The right to free speech does not excuse scrutiny and accountability over deliberate provocation of religious communities. Rushdie made a deliberate insult of faith resulting in violence and fatalities abroad — he must face legal repercussions.

While violent attacks are never justified, Rushdie must still answer for his works. The right to free speech does not excuse scrutiny and accountability over deliberate provocation of religious communities. Rushdie made a deliberate insult of faith resulting in violence and fatalities abroad — he must face legal repercussions.

Salman Rushdie Attacker Convicted in Terrorism Trial

Rushdie Attacker Convicted of Terrorism

The Spin

Metaculus Prediction

Go Deeper

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Salman Rushdie Attacker Convicted in Terrorism Trial

Rushdie Attacker Convicted of Terrorism

The Spin

Metaculus Prediction

Go Deeper

Sign Up for Our Free NewslettersSign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters