The New York Times

Appeals Court Upholds Blocks on Trump Order Restricting Mail Voting

OwenGregorian

FOX News

Federal appeals court rejects Trump bid to enforce mail ballot order ahead of midterm elections

CT Mirror

CT, other Democratic states sue Trump over mail-in ballot order

The White House

ENSURING CITIZENSHIP VERIFICATION AND INTEGRITY IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS

MS Now

Judge blocks Trump order that would curtail mail ballots by creating federal voter list

PJ Media

Leftist Judges Again Block Trumps Efforts to Stop Cheating in Elections

The Gateway Pundit

BREAKING: Far-Left Activist First Circuit Judges Block Trumps Historic Election Integrity Executive Order in 23 Blue States  Protecting Mail-In Ballot Chaos Ahead of 2026 Midterms * The Gateway Pund

TheSCIF

Democracy Docket

Trumps anti-mail voting order gets blocked again, this time by federal appeals court

New York Post

allenanalysis

The Hill

Appeals court upholds injunction on Trump’s mail-in voting order

CBS News

Federal appeals court upholds ruling blocking Trump's order to create federal voter list

Reuters

US appeals court rules Trump cannot implement mail-in voting order

LiveNOW from FOX

Appeals Court backs block on Trumps federal voter list, mail-in voting order

The Washington Examiner

Appeals court hands Trump administration mail-in voting setback ahead of midterm elections

Breitbart

Court rules against Trump effort to limit mail-in voting - Breitbart

Metaculus

Will Trump Declare A National Emergency Re Election Integrity

Donald Trump

Nancy Pelosi

Kevin McCarthy

Ron DeSantis

Marjorie Taylor Greene

Mike Johnson

Hakeem Jeffries

Gavin Newsom

Thom Tillis

Nancy Mace

James Carville

Manuel Bonder

Paul Begala

Mike Marinella

Newt Gingrich

Larry Diamond

Larry Sabato

"I’m very, very bullish about the midterms. I know that we are going to win because we have a great record to run on"

"[MAGA voters] will need to show up at the ballot box; President Trump and Republicans are going to make that happen.”

"If this story is properly told, we should win the Midterm Elections in RECORD NUMBERS."

"[Trump voters] won’t turn out to vote for a typical congressman in a midterm when Trump isn’t running."

“If we [GOP] are where we are today in the beginning of the second quarter [of 2026], then I think we’re in for a really rough time in November.”

“If we fail to pass legislation that permanently secures the border, addresses the affordability crisis, improves healthcare, and restores law and order, we [GOP] will lose this majority.”

“Our best shot was the first 6-9 months. And when Republicans likely lose the midterms it will become total and complete political war and gridlock once again.”

"I think we will win them back, probably all of them, maybe more, in this election, and Hakeem Jeffries will be the speaker of the House."

"Next [2026] year when we will take back control of the House of Representatives."

“He’s going to definitely deal with a Democratic House. I think it’s more likely that he’ll be dealing with a Democratic Senate.”

Will the Republicans Lose Control of Either Houses of Congress in the 2026 US Midterm Elections?

Harry Enten

Chuck Schumer

James M. Lindsay

Polymarket

Nate Cohn

Kirsten Gillibrand

PredictIt

Election Betting Odds

RacetotheWH

Matt K. Lewis

"If I had to bet today — and I tend to define bet as “regret later” — I’d put my chips on the Democrats."

"Donald Trump knows, his party knows, that they’re at risk of losing this election in 2026"

"A feasible path for the [Democratic] party to win the Senate is coming into focus."

"There is a 47.4% chance the Republican Party will control the US Senate in 2026."

"There is a 48% the Republican Party will win the US Senate in 2026."

"There is a 52% chance the Republican Party will control the Senate after the 2026 election."

"There is a 53.2% chance the Republicans will win a Senate Majority in 2026."

"Democrats face an uphill battle to capture the U.S. Senate in the November midterm elections."

"Republicans are favored to retain their majority in the Senate. "

Will Republicans Maintain Control of the Senate After the November 2026 Midterm Elections?

The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Saturday rejected the Trump administration's request to lift an injunction blocking key provisions of a March executive order that sought to tighten mail-in voting rules ahead of November's midterm elections.

The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Saturday rejected the Trump administration's request to lift an injunction blocking key provisions of a March executive order that sought to tighten mail-in voting rules ahead of November's midterm elections.

The executive order, signed in March, directed the Department of Homeland Security to compile lists of confirmed U.S. citizens eligible to vote in each state and required the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail ballots only to people on those lists.

The executive order, signed in March, directed the Department of Homeland Security to compile lists of confirmed U.S. citizens eligible to vote in each state and required the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail ballots only to people on those lists.

Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia, led by California, Massachusetts, Nevada and Washington, filed suit against the order, arguing the Constitution grants states and Congress — not the president — authority over election administration.

Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia, led by California, Massachusetts, Nevada and Washington, filed suit against the order, arguing the Constitution grants states and Congress — not the president — authority over election administration.

U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani ruled in June that several provisions of the order likely exceeded presidential authority, blocking federal agencies from implementing them in plaintiff states through the Nov. 3 federal elections.

U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani ruled in June that several provisions of the order likely exceeded presidential authority, blocking federal agencies from implementing them in plaintiff states through the Nov. 3 federal elections.

The appeals court, in a 2-1 ruling, found that plaintiff states already faced looming election deadlines and had begun preparing for potential changes, writing that the states had "no practical choice but to respond to the (order) now."

Brian Allen Analysis

The appeals court, in a 2-1 ruling, found that plaintiff states already faced looming election deadlines and had begun preparing for potential changes, writing that the states had "no practical choice but to respond to the (order) now."

The Department of Justice said it is "reviewing all options" following the ruling, and had previously warned it may seek emergency relief from the U.S. Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in the administration's favor.

The Department of Justice said it is "reviewing all options" following the ruling, and had previously warned it may seek emergency relief from the U.S. Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in the administration's favor.

Appeals court upholds injunction on Trump’s mail-in voting order

AppealsCourt courtBlocks upholdsTrump injunctionMail-In onVoting Trump’sOrder mail-inBefore voting orderMidterms

The Controversies

Johnson

RNC

Trump

DeSantis

Tillis

Mace

Greene

Pelosi

Jeffries

Lewis

Schumer

Cohn

Odds

PredictIt

Reuters

Lindsay

Go Deeper

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Appeals court upholds injunction on Trump’s mail-in voting order

AppealsCourt courtBlocks upholdsTrump injunctionMail-In onVoting Trump’sOrder mail-inBefore voting orderMidterms

The Controversies

Johnson

RNC

Trump

DeSantis

Tillis

Mace

Greene

Pelosi

Jeffries

Lewis

Schumer

Cohn

Odds

PredictIt

Reuters

Lindsay

Go Deeper

Sign Up for Our Free NewslettersSign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters