Politico

Judge Rules Against Doj Atlanta 2020 Election 00989217

USA Today

Judge blocks Trump's 'unreasonable' subpoena in 2020 election saga

ABC News

Judge's ruling in Georgia election case is latest setback for Trump DOJ

The New York Times

2020 Election Inquiry Trump Georgia.Html

Trump-nominated judge halts DOJ demand for identities of 2020 election workers

Courthouse News Service

Judge quashes Trump demand for private info of all 2020 Fulton County election workers

The Washington Examiner

Judge quashes DOJ subpoena for names of 2020 election workers

The Associated Press

Judge rejects Justice Department attempt to get names of 2020 election workers in Fulton County

Esquire

A Federal Judge Just Smacked Down One of Trumps Ridiculous Voter-Fraud Crusades

KeishaForGA

HollyKesler

amuse

TheSCIF

Metaculus

The Center Square

Judge quashes subpoena of election workers' personal information

Harmeet Dhillon

Pam Bondi

Justin Levitt

Tobias Read

True the Vote

Bob Ferguson

Steve Hobbs

Jena Griswold

Cisco Aguilar

Michael Adams

Deidre Henderson

Matt Crane

Chuck Gray

Don Millis

Daniel Coble

“We will not hand over Coloradans’ sensitive voting information to Donald Trump. He does not have a legal right to the information.”

“The U.S. DOJ is simply asking the commission to do something that the commission is explicitly forbidden by Wisconsin law to do.”

“Washington is not going to turn over this personal information. If they do release the lawsuit, we are very confident we will be successful in court.”

"I'm not going to turn over the list to the Department of Justice."

“The federal government has no role in list maintenance.”

“It’s hard for me to imagine any Republican state with faith in its own list maintenance capacity agreeing to outsource that decision to the DOJ.”

“They’re also not likely, but these are things people need to be on guard for.”

Rick Hasen

“We are in the process of reviewing the document with our attorneys and carefully considering our options.”

"They’re entitled to the vast majority of information — people’s names, addresses, birthdays"

“At this Department of Justice, we will not permit states to jeopardize the integrity and effectiveness of elections by refusing to abide by our federal elections laws. If states will not fulfill their duty to protect the integrity of the ballot, we will.”

“Accurate voter rolls are the cornerstone of fair and free elections, and too many states have fallen into a pattern of noncompliance with basic voter roll maintenance.”

Will the Trump Administration Successfully Compel States to Provide Voter Roll Data?

A federal judge on Tuesday quashed a Department of Justice grand jury subpoena seeking the names, addresses, phone numbers and email addresses of thousands of Fulton County, Georgia, election workers who participated in the 2020 election.

A federal judge on Tuesday quashed a Department of Justice grand jury subpoena seeking the names, addresses, phone numbers and email addresses of thousands of Fulton County, Georgia, election workers who participated in the 2020 election.

U.S. District Judge William Ray, a Trump appointee, called the breadth of the April subpoena "staggering" and ruled it was an "arbitrary fishing expedition" that was "unreasonable and must be quashed."

U.S. District Judge William Ray, a Trump appointee, called the breadth of the April subpoena "staggering" and ruled it was an "arbitrary fishing expedition" that was "unreasonable and must be quashed."

Ray ruled that the five-year statute of limitations for crimes related to the 2020 election had "long expired," meaning the DOJ could not bring viable charges against anyone, regardless of what the subpoenaed records might reveal.

Ray ruled that the five-year statute of limitations for crimes related to the 2020 election had "long expired," meaning the DOJ could not bring viable charges against anyone, regardless of what the subpoenaed records might reveal.

The DOJ said the ruling "jeopardizes both the historic purview of the grand jury and a long-delayed assessment of 2020 election processes" and that it was "considering all options to challenge."

The DOJ said the ruling "jeopardizes both the historic purview of the grand jury and a long-delayed assessment of 2020 election processes" and that it was "considering all options to challenge."

Ray also found that releasing the personal information of poll workers and volunteers would "chill participation in future elections." Fulton County had argued the subpoena was an attempt to "target, harass and punish" perceived political opponents.

Ray also found that releasing the personal information of poll workers and volunteers would "chill participation in future elections." Fulton County had argued the subpoena was an attempt to "target, harass and punish" perceived political opponents.

The subpoena followed an FBI raid in January in which agents seized more than 600 boxes of ballots and election materials from Fulton County's Elections Hub and Operations Center. A separate federal judge in May denied the county's request to have those materials returned.

The subpoena followed an FBI raid in January in which agents seized more than 600 boxes of ballots and election materials from Fulton County's Elections Hub and Operations Center. A separate federal judge in May denied the county's request to have those materials returned.

Judge Rejects DOJ From Accessing Names of 2020 Fulton County Election Workers

Judge Rejects DOJ From Accessing Names of 2020 Fulton County Election Workers

The Controversies

Griswold

Millis

Ferguson

Hobbs

Crane

Hasen

Henderson

Adams

Dhillon

Bondi

Go Deeper

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Judge Rejects DOJ From Accessing Names of 2020 Fulton County Election Workers

The Controversies

Griswold

Millis

Ferguson

Hobbs

Crane

Hasen

Henderson

Adams

Dhillon

Bondi

Go Deeper

Sign Up for Our Free NewslettersSign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters