GOV.UK

PM calls social media companies into Downing Street

House of Commons

Childrenswellbeingandschoolsbill#Contribution 1Cbba4A0 624D 42A1 A645 2F1E259C2928

Metaculus

Will Starmer Leave Office In 2026

Unherd

The case against social media bans

Molly Rose Foundation

Spotlight on social media bans: A parents guide

Research Gate

401211034_Social_Media_Bans_For_Teens_Lack_Evidence

Snap Inc.

Australias social media ban is a high-stakes experiment

Beyond the Headlines: Metas Record of Protecting Teens and Supporting Parents

lukejcr

Our children's safety matters more than clicks, that's why if Big Tech won't do anything I will, writes Sir Keir Starmer

PM: No platform gets a free pass: Government takes action to keep children safe online

The Standard

Risks to children on social media cant go on like this, PM tells tech bosses

Independent

Starmer summons X, TikTok and Meta bosses to No 10 as he pushes for further action on child safety online

Growing up in the online world: a national conversation

GB News

Keir Starmer summons social media bosses to No10 as Labour weighs new restrictions

Osint613

Keir_Starmer

PolitlcsUK

BBC News

Things can't go on like this, Starmer tells social media bosses

'Social media puts children at risk. We cant go on like this,' Starmer tells tech bosses

John Rentoul

Chris Hopkins

Wes Streeting

Lee Harris

The Daily Express

John Rees

George Galloway

Samara Gill

Isabel Oakeshott

Esther McVey

Charlie Rowley

Daily Mail

Sky News

"The way things are going, just a year in — I genuinely think he will leave. I think he will be forced out."

"Starmer might have to go in months."

"I don't think he will survive a year [as prime minister]."

"Of course [he will be prime minister till 2029]."

How Long Will Keir Starmer Be UK's Prime Minister?

Anthony Albanese

9News Australia

Terry Flew

Australian Human Rights Commission

Aaron Mackey

Joanne Orlando

Melissa McIntosh

Damini Satija

Julie Inman Grant

Timothy Koskie

"They took the easy option, and it will fail."

“New accounts are being created and the age-verification tools that the government assured Australians would be effective, have proven laughably easy to bypass with some makeup and good lighting.”

“Tech-savvy teens simply use VPNs, fake birth photos for face scans, or migrate to less regulated platforms like Lemon8, or to platforms not part of the ban like video games. Enforcement is proving to be difficult in the days leading up to the ban.”

"Some verification methods are often inaccurate while others are easily circumvented.”

"Technological workarounds – such as VPNs and false age declarations – may undermine the effectiveness of the ban."

"This law will also push many users toward platforms that are more personal and private, like Telegram channels, WhatsApp Communities, and Signal Groups, which are not currently banned because they are important tools for encrypted and direct communication."

David Inserra

“Ultimately, reducing online harm would be a great outcome; however, we know from evidence that ‘banning’ anything from young people won’t work on its own.”

Louise La Sala

“There’s a fair amount of teething problems around it. Many young people have been posting on TikTok that they successfully evaded the age limitations and that’s to be expected.”

"I think it will help a lot of parents because it's not them saying no, it's an actual law."

Cassie Xintavelonis

“We don’t expect safety laws to eliminate every single breach. If we did, speed limits would have failed because people speed, drinking limits would have failed because, believe it or not, some kids do get access to alcohol.”

“The fact that teenagers occasionally find a way to have a drink doesn’t diminish the value of having a clear national standard.”

"Just as the banning of phones in school classrooms by many state governments hasn't on day one led to perfect compliance, now it's just accepted that there are improved educational outcomes, improved behaviour, improved social outcomes as a result."

"Australia's social media ban is already driving change, and is proof that the threat of regulation works, even before the law takes effect. Waiting for perfect policy risks paralysis when real progress is already within reach.”

Will Australia's Under 16 Social Media Ban be Effective?

U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer met with senior executives from Meta, X, Snap, TikTok and Google at Downing Street on Thursday to call for stronger child safety measures online. The meeting came midway through the government's "Growing Up in the Online World" consultation, which has received more than 45,000 responses.

U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer met with senior executives from Meta, X, Snap, TikTok and Google at Downing Street on Thursday to call for stronger child safety measures online. The meeting came midway through the government's "Growing Up in the Online World" consultation, which has received more than 45,000 responses.

Attendees at the Downing Street meeting included Kate Alessi of Google U.K., Markus Reinisch of Meta, Wifredo Fernandez of X, Alistair Law of TikTok and Snap's Europe president Ronan Harris.

Attendees at the Downing Street meeting included Kate Alessi of Google U.K., Markus Reinisch of Meta, Wifredo Fernandez of X, Alistair Law of TikTok and Snap's Europe president Ronan Harris.

Starmer told tech executives: "things can't go on like this," adding that restricting children's access to social media would be "preferable to a world where harm is the price of participation." The government's consultation explores measures including an <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.verity.news/story/2025/australias-youtube-exemption-under-fire-in-social-media-ban">Australia-style ban for under-16s</a>, limits on addictive features and stronger AI chatbot controls.

Starmer told tech executives: "things can't go on like this," adding that restricting children's access to social media would be "preferable to a world where harm is the price of participation." The government's consultation explores measures including an Australia-style ban for under-16s, limits on addictive features and stronger AI chatbot controls.

Google UK managing director Kate Alessi has said the company believes "blanket bans take choices away from parents and push kids out of supervised spaces." Some platforms have already introduced voluntary protections, including disabling autoplay for younger users and giving parents greater control over screen time.

Google UK managing director Kate Alessi has said the company believes "blanket bans take choices away from parents and push kids out of supervised spaces." Some platforms have already introduced voluntary protections, including disabling autoplay for younger users and giving parents greater control over screen time.

This comes as U.K. MPs <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://verity.news/story/2026/uk-mps-reject-social-media-ban-for-unders">rejected a second House of Lords amendment</a> to ban under-16s from social media. However, powers have already been passed to, in theory, restrict or ban children of certain ages from accessing social media services and chatbots.

This comes as U.K. MPs rejected a second House of Lords amendment to ban under-16s from social media. However, powers have already been passed to, in theory, restrict or ban children of certain ages from accessing social media services and chatbots.

Education minister Olivia Bailey has stated that the government will only take prospective action following the end of its public consultation, which closes on May 26.

Education minister Olivia Bailey has stated that the government will only take prospective action following the end of its public consultation, which closes on May 26.

GOV.UK #

House of Commons #

Metaculus #

Unherd #

Molly Rose Foundation #

Research Gate #

Snap Inc. #

Meta #

LBC #

The Standard #

Independent #

GB News #

BBC News #

Starmer told tech executives that "things can't go on like this" and that restricting children's access to social media would be "preferable to a world where harm is the price of participation." The government's consultation explores measures including an Australia-style ban for under-16s, limits on addictive features and stronger AI chatbot controls.

Starmer told tech executives that "things can't go on like this" and that restricting children's access to social media would be "preferable to a world where harm is the price of participation." The government's consultation explores measures including an Australia-style ban for under-16s, limits on addictive features and stronger AI chatbot controls.

This comes as U.K. MPs <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://verity.news/story/2026/uk-mps-reject-social-media-ban-for-unders">rejected a second House of Lords amendment</a> to immediate under-16s from social media. However powers have already been pasted to, in theory, restrict or ban children of certain ages from accessing social media services and chatbots.

This comes as U.K. MPs rejected a second House of Lords amendment to immediate under-16s from social media. However powers have already been pasted to, in theory, restrict or ban children of certain ages from accessing social media services and chatbots.

Social media companies have had years to fix their platforms and have done nowhere near enough, with Big Tech profiteering as are kids exposed to harmful content. Starmer's message is a necessary final straw: if these companies can't prove their products are safe quickly, swift regulation is the only responsible move to protect British society.

Social media companies have had years to fix their platforms and have done nowhere near enough, with Big Tech profiteering as are kids exposed to harmful content. Starmer's message is a necessary final straw: if these companies can't prove their products are safe quickly, swift regulation is the only responsible move to protect British society.

Luke Charters MP

This well-intentioned intervention is the wrong approach by Starmer. Big Tech is out of control, but there is no causational evidence that a social media ban is either enforceable or will positively impact chilld mental health. Instead of a blanket ban, the government must use and enhance the powers they already have to compel a healthy, age-appropriate digital environment for youth.

This well-intentioned intervention is the wrong approach by Starmer. Big Tech is out of control, but there is no causational evidence that a social media ban is either enforceable or will positively impact chilld mental health. Instead of a blanket ban, the government must use and enhance the powers they already have to compel a healthy, age-appropriate digital environment for youth.

Big Tech bashing will not solve online safety concerns. Social media platforms have spent years applying state-of-the-art guardrails to protect children whilst empowering adults to make their own decisions. Starmer can lecture all he likes but a ban will only damage bsuiness relations, reduce youth connectively and leave everyone worse off.

Big Tech bashing will not solve online safety concerns. Social media platforms have spent years applying state-of-the-art guardrails to protect children whilst empowering adults to make their own decisions. Starmer can lecture all he likes but a ban will only damage bsuiness relations, reduce youth connectively and leave everyone worse off.

There is a 56% chance that Keir Starmer will cease to be U.K. prime minister in 2026, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

There is a 56% chance that Keir Starmer will cease to be U.K. prime minister in 2026, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

UK: Starmer Summons Tech Bosses Over Child Online Safety

Leon Neal/POOL/AFP/Getty Images

UK: Starmer Summons Tech Bosses Over Child Online Safety

Media

Politics

Science & technology

United Kingdom

This well-intentioned intervention is the wrong approach. Big Tech is out of control, but there is no causational evidence that a social media ban is either enforceable or will positively impact child mental health. Instead of a blanket ban, the government must use and enhance the powers they already have to compel a healthy, age-appropriate digital environment for youth.

This well-intentioned intervention is the wrong approach. Big Tech is out of control, but there is no causational evidence that a social media ban is either enforceable or will positively impact child mental health. Instead of a blanket ban, the government must use and enhance the powers they already have to compel a healthy, age-appropriate digital environment for youth.

UK: Starmer Summons Tech Bosses Over Child Online Safety

UK: Starmer Summons Tech Bosses Over Child Online Safety

The Spin

Metaculus Prediction

The Controversies

Rowley

News

Gill

Streeting

Australia

McIntosh

Orlando

Mackey

Commission

Inserra

Sala

Flew

Xintavelonis

Grant

Albanese

Albanese

Koskie

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters

UK: Starmer Summons Tech Bosses Over Child Online Safety

UK: Starmer Summons Tech Bosses Over Child Online Safety

The Spin

Metaculus Prediction

The Controversies

Rowley

News

Gill

Streeting

Australia

McIntosh

Orlando

Mackey

Commission

Inserra

Sala

Flew

Xintavelonis

Grant

Albanese

Albanese

Koskie

Sign Up for Our Free NewslettersSign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters