The Associated Press

Steve Bannon wins Supreme Court order likely to lead to dismissal of contempt of Congress conviction

SCOTUSblog

Court allows Steve Bannon to move forward on dismissal of criminal charges against him

Supreme Court sends Steve Bannon contempt case back to district court

The New York Times

Trump News

BBC News

US Supreme Court paves way for dismissal of Steve Bannon conviction

Supreme Court clears path for Trumps DOJ to dismiss criminal case against Steve Bannon

MS Now

Supreme Court agrees to help Trump DOJ move to dismiss Steve Bannons contempt case

Daily Mail

Steve Bannon set to be CLEARED as Supreme Court makes bombshell ruling

New York Post

Supreme Court sets stage for DOJ to toss criminal case against Steve Bannon for defying Congress

The New Republic

Supreme Court Hands Steve Bannon a Massive Win

EWess92

US Supreme Court

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

RealAmVoice

TomFitton

Donald Trump

Alina Habba

Pam Bondi

Thomas Massie

Natalie Jean Beisner

Christianity Today

Lara Trump

Gene Trevino

Natalie F Danelishen

John Jackson

Andrew Bustamante

Metaculus

Will the US government release additional Epstein documents in 2025?

"We are unlikely to ever see the [Epstein] files."

"They are not gonna release it."

"The GOP will never ever release the Epstein files voluntarily."

"They decided they don't want it released."

"Trump's administration will NOT release the Epstein client list."

"It's a new administration, and everything's going to come out to the public."

"Yeah, yeah, I would [release Epstein files]."

Will The Trump Administration Release the Epstein Files?

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday sent Steve Bannon's contempt of Congress case back to a lower court, vacating an appeals court ruling that had upheld <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.verity.news/story/2022/jan-bannon-sentenced-to-four-months-in-prison">his 2022 conviction for defying a subpoena from the House committee</a> investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riots.

Tom Fitton

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday sent Steve Bannon's contempt of Congress case back to a lower court, vacating an appeals court ruling that had upheld his 2022 conviction for defying a subpoena from the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riots.

<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.verity.news/story/2024/steve-bannon-begins-fourmonth-prison-sentence-for-contempt">Bannon served a four-month sentence</a> at a low-security federal facility in Connecticut in 2024. The potential dismissal is considered largely symbolic, as he has already completed his prison term.

Bannon served a four-month sentence at a low-security federal facility in Connecticut in 2024. The potential dismissal is considered largely symbolic, as he has already completed his prison term.

The Trump administration's Justice Department <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.verity.news/story/2026/doj-moves-to-dismiss-steve-bannon-contempt-case-2">filed a motion to dismiss Bannon's indictment in February</a>, stating it had "determined in its prosecutorial discretion that dismissal of this criminal case is in the interests of justice."

The Trump administration's Justice Department filed a motion to dismiss Bannon's indictment in February, stating it had "determined in its prosecutorial discretion that dismissal of this criminal case is in the interests of justice."

Bannon's legal team argued he did not willfully defy the subpoena, contending he relied on attorneys' advice to withhold compliance while courts resolved Trump's executive privilege claims. A federal appeals court ruled in 2024 that such advice-of-counsel reasoning was "no defense at all."

Bannon's legal team argued he did not willfully defy the subpoena, contending he relied on attorneys' advice to withhold compliance while courts resolved Trump's executive privilege claims. A federal appeals court ruled in 2024 that such advice-of-counsel reasoning was "no defense at all."

Bannon's attorney Michael Buschbacher said in a statement that the Supreme Court's order was "a welcome correction," adding that "this case should never have been brought." The dismissal would not affect <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.verity.news/story/2025/bannon-pleads-guilty-in-border-wall-fraud-avoids-prison-time">Bannon's separate New York state guilty plea for defrauding donors</a> to a private border wall fundraising effort.

Bannon's attorney Michael Buschbacher said in a statement that the Supreme Court's order was "a welcome correction," adding that "this case should never have been brought." The dismissal would not affect Bannon's separate New York state guilty plea for defrauding donors to a private border wall fundraising effort.

The Supreme Court issued a similar order in the case of former Cincinnati council member Alexander Sittenfeld, who was convicted on federal bribery and extortion charges and sentenced to 16 months in prison, sending that case back to the 6th Circuit following a government motion to dismiss.

The Supreme Court issued a similar order in the case of former Cincinnati council member Alexander Sittenfeld, who was convicted on federal bribery and extortion charges and sentenced to 16 months in prison, sending that case back to the 6th Circuit following a government motion to dismiss.

The Associated Press #

SCOTUSblog #

UPI #

The New York Times #

BBC News #

CNN #

MS Now #

Daily Mail #

New York Post #

The New Republic #

US Supreme Court #

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit #

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday sent Steve Bannon's contempt of Congress case back to a lower court, vacating an appeals court ruling that had upheld his 2022 conviction for defying a subpoena from the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday sent Steve Bannon's contempt of Congress case back to a lower court, vacating an appeals court ruling that had upheld his 2022 conviction for defying a subpoena from the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.

Bannon served a four-month sentence at a low-security federal facility in Connecticut in 2024. The potential dismissal is considered largely symbolic, as he has already completed his prison term.

The Trump administration's Justice Department filed a motion to dismiss Bannon's indictment in February, stating it had "determined in its prosecutorial discretion that dismissal of this criminal case is in the interests of justice."

Bannon's attorney Michael Buschbacher said in a statement that the Supreme Court's order was "a welcome correction," adding that "this case should never have been brought." The dismissal would not affect Bannon's separate New York state guilty plea for defrauding donors to a private border wall fundraising effort.

The Supreme Court's move to vacate Bannon's conviction is a political favor dressed up as justice — Bannon deliberately defied a lawful congressional subpoena, served his time, and courts at every level confirmed the conviction was sound. Letting the Trump DOJ erase a valid contempt conviction sets a dangerous precedent that powerful allies can simply ignore Congress. Accountability for January 6 shouldn't evaporate because the political winds shifted.

The Supreme Court's move to vacate Bannon's conviction is a political favor dressed up as justice — Bannon deliberately defied a lawful congressional subpoena, served his time, and courts at every level confirmed the conviction was sound. Letting the Trump DOJ erase a valid contempt conviction sets a dangerous precedent that powerful allies can simply ignore Congress. Accountability for January 6 shouldn't evaporate because the political winds shifted.

The Bannon contempt conviction was built on a shaky legal foundation — the subpoenaing committee was improperly constituted, and the government never had to prove Bannon acted with genuine criminal intent. Prosecuting someone for a good-faith executive privilege assertion stretches contempt law beyond its proper limits. The Supreme Court's remand is a necessary correction that restores rule-of-law principles.

The Bannon contempt conviction was built on a shaky legal foundation — the subpoenaing committee was improperly constituted, and the government never had to prove Bannon acted with genuine criminal intent. Prosecuting someone for a good-faith executive privilege assertion stretches contempt law beyond its proper limits. The Supreme Court's remand is a necessary correction that restores rule-of-law principles.

Supreme Court Sends Bannon Contempt Case Back to Lower Court

Supreme Court Sends Bannon Contempt Case Back to Lower Court

The Spin

The Controversies

Metaculus

Bustamante

Jackson

Massie

Trevino

Bondi

Trump

Go Deeper

Articles on this story

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Supreme Court Sends Bannon Contempt Case Back to Lower Court

Supreme Court Sends Bannon Contempt Case Back to Lower Court

The Spin

The Controversies

Metaculus

Bustamante

Jackson

Massie

Trevino

Bondi

Trump

Go Deeper

Articles on this story

Sign Up for Our Free NewslettersSign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters