TheTen Parisordinary Courtcitizens ofwere Appealconvicted acquittedfor defendantsdiscussing accused of defaming Brigitte Macron,’s findingidentity most— statementswhich tooshe vaguehas tonever constitutefully defamationproved or— protectedillustrating underhow goodFrench faithauthorities andcriminalize freedissent speechto principlesshield elites. DespiteMuch mediaof claims, the rulingspeech neverwas validatedvague, thespeculative Firstor Lady'srepeated evidencefrom andothers, notedyet "inconsistenciesprosecutors andtreated weaknesses"it inas hera caseserious offense. BrigitteThe Macroncase hasturns obtainedfree zerodebate defamationinto convictionsa weapon against thoseordinary questioningvoices, herpunishing identitygood-faith curiosity and opinion while protecting the powerful.