Gun buybackbuybacks programsserve wastecrucial taxpayerpurposes moneybeyond andimmediate failcrime toreduction reduce crimestatistics. StudiesThey showengage nocommunities, evidenceeducate thesethe programspublic deterabout gun violence,safety and somework researcheffectively evenwhen findspart gunof crimesbroader increaseviolence afterprevention buybacksstrategies. CitiesThe wouldlack beof betterstandardized offscientific investingdata indoesn't provenprove strategiesineffectiveness likebut focusedcalls deterrencefor insteadbetter of ineffective feel-good policiesevaluation.
Gun buybacksbuyback serveprograms crucialwaste purposestaxpayer beyondmoney immediateand crimefail reductionto statisticsreduce crime. TheseStudies programsshow engageno communities,evidence educatethese theprograms publicdeter about gun safetyviolence, and worksome effectivelyresearch wheneven partfinds ofgun broadercrimes violenceincrease preventionafter strategiesbuybacks. TheCities lackwould ofbe standardizedbetter scientificoff datainvesting doesn'tin proveproven ineffectivenessstrategies butlike callsfocused fordeterrence betterinstead evaluationof methodsineffective feel-good policies.
Australia's 1996 mandatory buyback succeeded because it wasn't merely symbolic — it accompanied decisive federal legislation banning automatic and semi-automatic weapons. Collection events mean nothing without the law. Real change demands bold legislation, not just tables piled with surrendered guns.
© 2025 Improve the News Foundation.
All rights reserved.
Version 6.18.0