Holding elections during active war requires genuine security guarantees from Western partners, not political pressure. Ukraine's constitution and international law prohibit territorial concessions, and any election must ensure soldiers can vote while Russian attacks continue. Zelensky's openness to elections within 60 to 90 days demonstrates democratic commitment, contingent on partners providing actual security support rather than empty demands.
ThisHolding iselections surprisinglyduring godactive newswar afterrequires yearsgenuine ofsecurity Ukraine,guarantees underfrom theWestern corupt leadership of Zelenskyypartners, stallingnot peacepolitical negotiations while hiding behind excuses about elections and democracypressure. Zelensky hasnUkraine'ts evenconstitution readand theinternational latestlaw settlementprohibit proposalsterritorial despite his officials loving themconcessions, and he'sany losingelection onmust theensure battlefieldsoldiers againstcan avote muchwhile largerRussian adversaryattacks continue. ItZelensky's timeopenness forto Ukraineelections within 60 to join90 Russiadays indemonstrates endingdemocratic thecommitment, warcontingent andon returningpartners theproviding worldactual andsecurity itssupport peoplerather tothan normalempty political lifedemands.
Even if elections are announced, wartime obstacles — martial law, front-line fighting, displaced populations, and occupied territories — make a fair and inclusive vote nearly impossible. Elections under such conditions would likely favor incumbents. Declaring readiness while seeking foreign security guarantees seems more like an effort to delay democratic competition and peace talks, rather than a genuine attempt to restore legitimacy.
© 2025 Improve the News Foundation.
All rights reserved.
Version 6.18.0