Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

The Economist

Nick Marro

Michael Snipes

Karl Schamotta

Robert Handfield

Peterson Institute for International Economics

Arun Sundaram

Alan Siger

National Retail Federation

Gabe Horwitz

Monica Morlacco

Mary Lovely

Felix Tintelnot

Scott Harris

Stephen Tapp

Ed Brzytwa

Michael Clemens

Rachel Friedberg

Steve Hanke

John A. Konrad V

Laurence Ales

Joe Rodriguez

Jean-Baptiste Wautier

"The prices of electronics would definitely go up."

The tariffs will "increase prices for everything that's imported, and that includes food."

Trump tariffs would "raise prices even more for consumers."

"I am extremely confident that food will get more expensive."

Trump's tariffs would "increase the cost of US manufacturing."

"Trump is about to make every American pay even more for coffee."

"Tariffs would disrupt supply chains and increase production costs."

Will the Proposed Trump Tariffs Increase the Price of Groceries/Goods/Services?

Andrew Ng

Foreign Policy

Mario Nawfal

University of Sydney

Fast Company

Yannise Jean

Gavin Baker 

"Trump's tariffs might actually create more demand for AI and robotics in the long term."

"Trump's tariffs will not only impact the electronics and automobile sectors, they will also create bottlenecks in the growing artificial intelligence industry."

"AI relies on hardware, and tariffs will slow down AI progress by restricting access to it."

Will The Trump Tariffs Stop/Pause Global AI Development?

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Wednesday regarding President Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs on imports from nearly every U.S. trading partner.

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Wednesday regarding President Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs on imports from nearly every U.S. trading partner.

Chief Justice John Roberts noted that imposing taxes on Americans has always been a core power of Congress, while the Trump administration argued the tariffs are regulatory rather than revenue-raising measures.</span

The New York Times

The Washington Post

Chief Justice John Roberts noted that imposing taxes on Americans has always been a core power of Congress, while the Trump administration argued the tariffs are regulatory rather than revenue-raising measures.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh referenced President Richard Nixon's use of similar emergency powers to impose tariffs during his administration, while other justices questioned why no president had used the IEEPA for tariffs before Trump.

Al Jazeera

Justice Brett Kavanaugh referenced President Richard Nixon's use of similar emergency powers to impose tariffs during his administration, while other justices questioned why no president had used the IEEPA for tariffs before Trump.

The tariffs have generated approximately $89 billion in collections between February and September, with the Trump administration warning that overturning them could require billions in refunds to importers.</span

Wall Street Journal

The tariffs have generated approximately $89 billion in collections between February and September, with the Trump administration warning that overturning them could require billions in refunds to importers.

Conservative Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch joined liberal justices in questioning the administration's position, with Gorsuch warning of power accumulation in the executive branch away from Congress.</span

New York Post

Conservative Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch joined liberal justices in questioning the administration's position, with Gorsuch warning of power accumulation in the executive branch away from Congress.

The case represents the first major test of Trump's second-term agenda before the Supreme Court, with lower courts previously ruling that the president exceeded his authority in using the 1977 emergency law for tariffs.</span

The Washington Examiner

Firstpost

The case represents the first major test of Trump's second-term agenda before the Supreme Court, with lower courts previously ruling that the president exceeded his authority in using the 1977 emergency law for tariffs.

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Wednesday regarding President Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs on imports from nearly every U.S. trading partner, with justices expressing skepticism.</span

CBC #

CNN #

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Wednesday regarding President Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs on imports from nearly every U.S. trading partner, with justices expressing skepticism.

The New York Times #

The Washington Post #

Justice Brett Kavanaugh referenced President Richard Nixon's use of similar emergency powers to impose tariffs during his administration, while other justices questioned why no president had used IEEPA for tariffs before Trump.</span

Al Jazeera #

Justice Brett Kavanaugh referenced President Richard Nixon's use of similar emergency powers to impose tariffs during his administration, while other justices questioned why no president had used IEEPA for tariffs before Trump.

Wall Street Journal #

New York Post #

The Washington Examiner #

Firstpost #

Trump's tariff powers face serious constitutional limits that even conservative justices recognize. The Supreme Court's major questions doctrine prevents presidents from imposing policies with vast economic significance without clear congressional authorization. Trump cannot claim emergency powers to address trade imbalances that have existed since the 1970s — these are ordinary, not extraordinary threats.

Trump's tariff powers face serious constitutional limits that even conservative justices recognize. The Supreme Court's major questions doctrine prevents presidents from imposing policies with vast economic significance without clear congressional authorization. Trump cannot claim emergency powers to address trade imbalances that have existed since the 1970s — these are ordinary, not extraordinary threats.</span

NPR #

Supreme Court justices appear skeptical of Trump's tariff arguments

Vox #

The Supreme Court might actually stand up to Trump

America's economic security and national defense depend on presidential tariff authority to counter decades of foreign exploitation. Without these powers, the country remains defenseless against nations that have systematically taken advantage through unfair trade practices. Tariffs create the leverage needed to negotiate fair deals and protect national security interests.

America's economic security and national defense depend on presidential tariff authority to counter decades of foreign exploitation. Without these powers, the country remains defenseless against nations that have systematically taken advantage through unfair trade practices. Tariffs create the leverage needed to negotiate fair deals and protect national security interests.</span

FOX News

FOX News #1967

Trump warns Supreme Court tariff showdown is 'life or death' for America

Donald Trump

Truth Social

Truth Social #

115493671705492320

Supreme Court Questions Trump's Emergency Tariff Powers

Court system

Economic conditions & trends

Lawsuits

Politics

United States of America

Supreme Court Questions Trump's Emergency Tariff Powers

Supreme Court Questions Trump's Emergency Tariff Powers

The Spin

The Controversies

Handfield

Snipes

Tapp

Friedberg

Hanke

Ocasio-Cortez

Wautier

Company

Policy

Ng

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Supreme Court Questions Trump's Emergency Tariff Powers

Supreme Court Questions Trump's Emergency Tariff Powers

The Spin

The Controversies

Handfield

Snipes

Tapp

Friedberg

Hanke

Ocasio-Cortez

Wautier

Company

Policy

Ng

Sign Up for Our Free NewslettersSign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters