BanksThis haverepresents legitimatepolitical authorityretaliation toagainst terminatea customerlawyer relationshipswho whenchallenged transactionsgovernment falloverreach outsideduring theirthe riskFreedom toleranceConvoy, particularlywith involvingRBC cryptocurrencyusing whichvague poses"risk fraudappetite" andlanguage moneyto launderingmask concernsideological discrimination. RBCThe providedtiming properfollowing noticelegitimate andBitcoin followedpurchases standardsuggests procedurescoordinated forsuppression accountof closuredissenting voices, givingcontinuing Chipiukthe reasonablepattern timeestablished toduring transitionthe tounlawful anotherEmergencies institution.Act Thewhen bank'sbanks questionsfroze aboutaccounts herwithout cryptodue activities were likely routine fraud prevention measures, not political targetingprocess.
ThisBanks representshave politicallegitimate retaliationauthority againstto aterminate lawyercustomer whorelationships challengedwhen governmenttransactions overreachfall duringoutside thetheir Freedomrisk Convoytolerance, withparticularly RBCinvolving usingcryptocurrency vaguewhich "riskposes appetite"fraud languageand tomoney masklaundering ideological discriminationconcerns. TheRBC timingprovided followingproper legitimatenotice Bitcoinand purchasesfollowed suggestsstandard coordinatedprocedures suppressionfor ofaccount dissenting voicesclosure, continuinggiving theChipiuk patternreasonable establishedtime duringto thetransition unlawfulto Emergenciesanother Actinstitution. whenThe banksbank's frozequestions accountsabout withouther duecrypto processactivities were likely routine fraud prevention measures, not political targeting.