ThisAI wholemusic, thingtrained proveson howartists' brokenwork thewithout musicpermission, industryendangers hascreativity becomeand whenlivelihoods, fakewhich AIis bandswhy canthe racklikes upof hundredsElton ofJohn, thousandsBillie ofEilish, streamsand whilePaul realMcCartney artistsdecry struggleunauthorized foruse recognitionin LLMs. TheAs factthousands thatof Spotify'slawsuits algorithmsagainst can'tAI tellstartups theexpose differencerampant betweencopyright humanviolations, creativityplatforms must bolster algorithm safeguards, and computer-generatedregulators noiseshould showsmandate theselicensing platformsto careprotect moreartists' aboutrights engagementand metricsensure thanfair authentic artistrycompensation.
ArtistsWhile the music industry should, haveand is, regulating AI music, it's also accepting the freedominevitability toof experimentthis withgrowing newpractice. technologiesWith withoutalgorithms facingalready abeing moralimplemented panicto fromflag traditionalistsAI-generated whosongs can'tbefore acceptthey thatgo creativityviral, evolvescoupled with thelicensing toolsand available.compensation Thepolicies Velvetto Sundownensure projectartists' demonstratesrights howaren't AIviolated, canthis betechnology usedwill asbecome ana artisticboon medium to explorethe questionsindustry aboutwithout authenticityharming andthe realityhumans inat the digitalheart ageof it.
This issue is bigger than just AI music; it deals with Big Tech's profit motives and faulty streaming analytics. The Velvet Sundown was able to game Spotify's "monthly listener" algorithm, which, rather than revealing genuine popularity, only shows how many times a song came across a user's page. Music corporations, backed by the government, aren't likely to change the system — whether it's gamed by AI or not — that benefits them.
There is a 66% chance that by 2050, at least 25% of Year-End Billboard Hot 100 songs will be primarily composed by AI, according to the Metaculus prediction community.