Politico

Cia Review Of 2016 Russia Election Probe Finds No Major Flaws 00438159

Newsmax

CIA Review Slams Former Director for 2016 Russiagate

TASS

US Intel assessments on Russia and 2016 election could be politically motivated  CIA

InfoWars

Cia Director Following Bombshell Russia Gate Assessment Brennan Clapper Comey Manipulated Intelligence Silenced Career Pros All To Get Trump

The Hindu

New CIA report criticises investigation into Russia's support for Trump in 2016

CIA review criticizes procedures but not conclusions of intelligence report on 2016 Russia election interference

CIADirector

The Federalist

CIA Review Blasts Brennans Role In Launching Russia Hoax

The Epoch Times

Tradecraft Failures, Leadership Pressure Prominent in 2016 Russia-Trump Intel Assessment: CIA Report

<span>The review found that CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey, and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper were "excessively involved" in the assessment's development in a manner that was "highly unusual in both scope and intensity" and risked stifling analytic debate.</span

New York Post

The review found that CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey, and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper were "excessively involved" in the assessment's development in a manner that was "highly unusual in both scope and intensity" and risked stifling analytic debate.

<span>Despite procedural criticisms, the review concluded the 2016 assessment exhibited "strong adherence to tradecraft standards" and that its "analytic rigor exceeded that of most IC assessments," while not disputing the overall conclusions about Russian interference.</span

Despite procedural criticisms, the review concluded the 2016 assessment exhibited "strong adherence to tradecraft standards" and that its "analytic rigor exceeded that of most IC assessments," while not disputing the overall conclusions about Russian interference.

<span>The review specifically criticized the inclusion of the Steele dossier in the assessment, stating it "ran counter to fundamental tradecraft principles" and "undermined the credibility of a key judgment," despite strong opposition from CIA authors and senior Russia experts.</span

The review specifically criticized the inclusion of the Steele dossier in the assessment, stating it "ran counter to fundamental tradecraft principles" and "undermined the credibility of a key judgment," despite strong opposition from CIA authors and senior Russia experts.

<span>CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who commissioned the review, characterized the 2016 assessment as politically corrupted, posting on social media that "Brennan, Clapper and Comey manipulated intelligence and silenced career professionals — all to get Trump".</span

CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who commissioned the review, characterized the 2016 assessment as politically corrupted, posting on social media that "Brennan, Clapper and Comey manipulated intelligence and silenced career professionals — all to get Trump".

<span>Multiple investigations since 2016, including a Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee report in 2020 and Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, have reached similar conclusions about Russian interference and motives, which the current review does not directly contradict.</span

Multiple investigations since 2016, including a Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee report in 2020 and Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, have reached similar conclusions about Russian interference and motives, which the current review does not directly contradict.

Politico #

Newsmax #

TASS #

InfoWars #

The Hindu #

NBC #4228

The Federalist #

The Epoch Times #

<h2></h2>

CIA releases new report on 2016 Trump Russia probe

Espionage

Politics

United States of America

While the review identifies procedural issues with the 2016 assessment's production timeline and leadership involvement, it validates the underlying intelligence work and conclusions about Russian interference. The assessment's findings have been consistently supported by multiple investigations, including Republican-led inquiries, and the current review represents another attempt to relitigate settled conclusions for political purposes rather than genuine intelligence reform.

<span>While the review identifies procedural issues with the 2016 assessment's production timeline and leadership involvement, it validates the underlying intelligence work and conclusions about Russian interference. The assessment's findings have been consistently supported by multiple investigations, including Republican-led inquiries, and the current review represents another attempt to relitigate settled conclusions for political purposes rather than genuine intelligence reform.</span>

New CIA report criticizes investigation into Russia’s support for Trump in 2016

CIA Review Faults 2016 Russia Assessment Process, Upholds Findings

CIA Review Faults 2016 Russia Assessment Process, Upholds Findings

CIA releasesReview newFaults report2016 onRussia 2016Assessment TrumpProcess, RussiaUpholds probeFindings

The Spin

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters

CIA Review Faults 2016 Russia Assessment Process, Upholds Findings

CIA releasesReview newFaults report2016 onRussia 2016Assessment TrumpProcess, RussiaUpholds probeFindings

The Spin

Sign Up for Our Free NewslettersSign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters