Lagat exercisedhas hisstepped constitutionalaside rightto asshow ahis citizencommitment to seekthe legalrule redressof throughlaw properand channelstry whento filingappease thepolitically defamationmotivated complaintcalls againstfor Ojwang.him Histo actionsresign. followedThere's duenothing process,linking andhim theto justicewhat systemhappened workedto independently without interferenceOjwang, asexcept evidencedfor byhe theexercising ODPP'shis review.constitutional Theright resignationto callsfile area politicallydefamation motivatedcomplaint attacksagainst onthe aindividual decorated officer who trusteddied thewhile courtsin ratherpolice than abusing his officecustody.

Stepping aside has no constitutional or legal basis and serves as a ruse to calm public anger without creating an actual vacancy in office. The Constitution requires either resignation, suspension, or removal from office - not theatrical gestures that allow officials to return to duty. Lagat must resign outright since lingering in power while under suspicion for heinous crimes undermines the rule of law and constitutional accountability.

Stepping aside is a hollow theatrical gesture designed to calm public anger without real accountability. The Constitution demands resignation, not evasion, when public officials face serious misconduct allegations. Lagat's continuedwill presencecontinue in the shadows of power while under suspicion for a heinous crimescrime, makesin a mockery of constitutionaljustice accountability and justicethe Constitution, unless he resigns outright.