NPR Online News

Judge issues a temporary ruling against Trump using the National Guard in LA

New York Post

Federal judge questions constitutionality of Trump sending National Guard to LA riots: ‘President is, of course, limited’

Metaculus

Newsweek

Gavin Newsom's Legal Win Over Trump Lasts Only Hours

<h2></h2>

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted an administrative stay on Thursday, blocking a court order that would have otherwise compelled the Trump administration to return control of California’s National Guard to Gov. Gavin Newsom by noon Friday.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted an administrative stay on Thursday, blocking a court order that would have otherwise compelled the Trump administration to return control of California’s National Guard to Gov. Gavin Newsom by noon Friday.

Breyer also dismissed the Trump administration’s claim that the protests “constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States,” writing that the Los Angeles protests “fall far short” of the definition of a "rebellion."

Courtlistener

Breyer also dismissed the Trump administration’s claim that the protests “constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States,” writing that the Los Angeles protests “fall far short” of the definition of a "rebellion."

The Court of Appeals granted the motion and temporarily stayed the federal order, scheduling June 15 as the deadline for a response to the emergency motion, June 16 as the date for a reply, and June 17 for a remote hearing by Zoom.

Foxnews

Washington Post

The Court of Appeals granted the motion and temporarily stayed the federal order, scheduling June 15 as the deadline for a response to the emergency motion, June 16 as the date for a reply, and June 17 for a remote hearing by Zoom.

U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer had ruled earlier on Thursday that President Donald Trump’s actions were “illegal—both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.”

U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer had ruled earlier on Thursday that President Donald Trump’s actions were “illegal—both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.”

The White House

Shortly following Breyer’s judgment, the administration submitted an emergency motion calling for the 9th Circuit’s intervention, which described Breyer’s order as an “extraordinary intrusion” on presidential authority and insisted that disorder in Los Angeles met the criteria for a rebellion.

Shortly following Breyer’s judgment, the administration submitted an emergency motion calling for the 9th Circuit’s intervention, which described Breyer’s order as an “extraordinary intrusion” on presidential authority and insisted that disorder in Los Angeles met the criteria for a rebellion.

NPR Online News #1

New York Post #1

Metaculus #0

Newsweek #0

Newsweek #

New York Post #3798

U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer had ruled earlier that day that President Donald Trump’s actions were “illegal—both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.”

Courtlistener #

U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer had ruled earlier that day that President Donald Trump’s actions were “illegal—both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.”

Breyer also dismissed the Trump administration’s claim that the protests “constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States,” stating that the Los Angeles protests “fall far short” of the definition of a ‘rebellion.’

The White House #

Breyer also dismissed the Trump administration’s claim that the protests “constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States,” stating that the Los Angeles protests “fall far short” of the definition of a ‘rebellion.’

Shortly following Breyer’s judgment, the administration submitted an emergency motion calling for the 9th Circuit’s intervention, which described Breyer’s order as an “extraordinary intrusion” on presidential authority and insisted that disorder in Los Angeles met the criteria of a rebellion.

Shortly following Breyer’s judgment, the administration submitted an emergency motion calling for the 9th Circuit’s intervention, which described Breyer’s order as an “extraordinary intrusion” on presidential authority and insisted that disorder in Los Angeles met the criteria of a rebellion.

Washington Post #

President Trump welcomed the development in a Truth Social post, where he claimed that his administration had “saved L.A.” by mobilizing the National Guard, without which he stated Los Angeles would be “burning to the ground right now.”

Truth Social

Truth Social #

President Trump welcomed the development in a Truth Social post, where he claimed that his administration had “saved L.A.” by mobilizing the National Guard, without which he stated Los Angeles would be “burning to the ground right now.”

The administrative stay granted by the Court of Appeals has possibly saved Los Angeles. Breyer’s order was not only an unconstitutional attack on the office of the presidency but would have also left L.A. and its federal personnel to the mercy of violent mobs and rioters. With this decision, the Trump administration can continue its efforts to restore law and order to America’s streets.

The administrative stay granted by the Court of Appeals has possibly saved Los Angeles. Breyer’s order was not only an unconstitutional attack on the office of the presidency but would have also left L.A. and its federal personnel to the mercy of violent mobs and rioters. With this decision, the Trump administration can continue its efforts to restore law and order to America’s streets.

Newsom Et Al V Trump Et Al

11467551822731157

Despite the temporary setback posed by the Court of Appeal’s decision, Gov. Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta continue to have complete confidence in the law. The case argued by Judge Breyer makes it clear that Trump blatantly overstepped his presidential authority and violated the U.S. Constitution. The hearing on Tuesday will only expose the illegality of Trump’s actions further.

Despite the temporary setback posed by the Court of Appeal’s decision, Gov. Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta continue to have complete confidence in the law. The case argued by Judge Breyer makes it clear that Trump blatantly overstepped his presidential authority and violated the U.S. Constitution. The hearing on Tuesday will only expose the illegality of Trump’s actions further.

Appeals court says Trump can keep California National Guard deployed for now

Politico

Politico #

‘He is not a king:' Newsom rips Trump amid legal battle over Guard

There is a 66% chance there will be major civil unrest or rioting in America before 2031, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

There is a 66% chance there will be major civil unrest or rioting in America before 2031, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

Court of Appeals Allows Trump to Retain Control of National Guard in LA

FederalCourt Judgeof BlocksAppeals Allows Trump's to Retain Control of National Guard Deployment in LA

The Spin

Metaculus Prediction

Go Deeper

Articles on this story

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters