BBC News

MI5 neo-Nazi spy: Judge had 'no confidence' in Security Service's account of false evidence

MI5 lied to courts to defend handling of violent neo-Nazi agent

Canary

MI5 protected neo-Nazi agent who attacked girlfriend – then tried to get the BBC to cover it up

DutchNews.nl

Right-wing Dutch cabinet collapses after just 11 months

MI5 lied 'deliberately and repeatedly' in neo-Nazi spy case, BBC tells High Court

The Telegraph

MI5 deliberately and repeatedly lied in agents identity case, court told

Independent

MI5 apologises unreservedly to High Court for failings and errors

Centre for Women's Justice

MI5 misled multiple courts about informant who abused women  Centre for Women's Justice

<h2></h2>

MI5 issued an "unreserved apology" to the U.K. High Court after admitting it <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.verity.news/story/2025/mi-admits-false-court-evidence-in-neonazi-agent-case">provided false evidence and undertook "serious errors"</a> in three separate court proceedings regarding a neo-Nazi agent, known as X, who attacked his girlfriend with a machete.

MI5 issued an "unreserved apology" to the U.K. High Court after admitting it provided false evidence and undertook "serious errors" in three separate court proceedings regarding a neo-Nazi agent, known as X, who attacked his girlfriend with a machete.

MI5 had claimed it maintained its "neither confirm nor deny" policy regarding agent identities, despite a senior officer confirming agent X's status to a BBC journalist in 2020. The BBC later produced recordings and notes proving MI5 had departed from its protocol while trying to persuade the reporter to drop the investigation.

MI5 had claimed it maintained its "neither confirm nor deny" policy regarding agent identities, despite a senior officer confirming agent X's status to a BBC journalist in 2020. The BBC later produced recordings and notes proving MI5 had departed from its protocol while trying to persuade the reporter to drop the investigation.

MI5 Director General Sir Ken McCallum contacted BBC Director General Tim Davie to prevent publication, calling the reporting "inaccurate" and "reckless." Then-Home Secretary Suella Braverman also sought a court injunction to block publication, but the BBC was ultimately allowed to air the program without naming agent X.

Judiciary

MI5 Director General Sir Ken McCallum contacted BBC Director General Tim Davie to prevent publication, calling the reporting "inaccurate" and "reckless." Then-Home Secretary Suella Braverman also sought a court injunction to block publication, but the BBC was ultimately allowed to air the program without naming agent X.

The BBC's legal team told the Court that MI5 officers "deliberately and repeatedly lied," and that the threshold for contempt of court proceedings had been met. MI5's representatives instead alleged errors resulted from poor record-keeping and communication failures rather than intentional deception.

The BBC's legal team told the Court that MI5 officers "deliberately and repeatedly lied," and that the threshold for contempt of court proceedings had been met. MI5's representatives instead alleged errors resulted from poor record-keeping and communication failures rather than intentional deception.

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has appointed Sir Jonathan Jones KC to conduct an independent external review of MI5's procedures and recommend changes to ensure courts receive accurate information from the Security Service in future cases involving national security matters.

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has appointed Sir Jonathan Jones KC to conduct an independent external review of MI5's procedures and recommend changes to ensure courts receive accurate information from the Security Service in future cases involving national security matters.

MI5 have also acknowledged that it would no longer be possible to protect the name of agent X. The case is being presided over by three judges: Lady Chief Justice Baroness Sue Carr, Dame Victoria Sharp; and Mr Justice Chamberlain. As of Tuesday, the judges reserved their decision on the case until a later date.

MI5 have also acknowledged that it would no longer be possible to protect the name of agent X. The case is being presided over by three judges: Lady Chief Justice Baroness Sue Carr, Dame Victoria Sharp; and Mr Justice Chamberlain. As of Tuesday, the judges reserved their decision on the case until a later date.

BBC News #

Canary #3509

DutchNews.nl #

The Telegraph #

Independent #

Centre for Women's Justice #

The false testimony centered on MI5's claim that it maintained its "neither confirm nor deny" policy regarding agent identities, when in fact a senior officer had confirmed agent X's status to a BBC journalist during phone calls in 2020. The BBC later produced recordings and notes proving MI5 had departed from its standard secrecy protocol while trying to persuade the reporter to drop the investigation.</span

The false testimony centered on MI5's claim that it maintained its "neither confirm nor deny" policy regarding agent identities, when in fact a senior officer had confirmed agent X's status to a BBC journalist during phone calls in 2020. The BBC later produced recordings and notes proving MI5 had departed from its standard secrecy protocol while trying to persuade the reporter to drop the investigation.

MI5 Director General Sir Ken McCallum contacted BBC Director General Tim Davie directly in an attempt to prevent publication of the story about the abusive agent, calling the reporting "inaccurate as well as reckless." When the BBC refused to drop the story, then-Attorney General Suella Braverman sought a court injunction to block publication, though the BBC was ultimately allowed to air the program without naming the agent.</span

MI5 Director General Sir Ken McCallum contacted BBC Director General Tim Davie directly in an attempt to prevent publication of the story about the abusive agent, calling the reporting "inaccurate as well as reckless." When the BBC refused to drop the story, then-Attorney General Suella Braverman sought a court injunction to block publication, though the BBC was ultimately allowed to air the program without naming the agent.

The BBC's legal team argued that MI5 officers "deliberately and repeatedly lied" to the courts, with barrister Jude Bunting KC stating the threshold for contempt of court proceedings had been met against both the agency and individual officers. MI5's representative Sir James Eadie KC maintained the errors were not deliberate and resulted from poor record-keeping and communication failures rather than intentional deception.</span

The BBC's legal team argued that MI5 officers "deliberately and repeatedly lied" to the courts, with barrister Jude Bunting KC stating the threshold for contempt of court proceedings had been met against both the agency and individual officers. MI5's representative Sir James Eadie KC maintained the errors were not deliberate and resulted from poor record-keeping and communication failures rather than intentional deception.

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper appointed Sir Jonathan Jones KC, former head of the government legal service, to conduct an independent external review of how MI5 came to provide false evidence to the courts. The investigation will examine MI5's procedures and recommend changes to ensure courts receive accurate information from the Security Service in future cases involving national security matters.</span

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper appointed Sir Jonathan Jones KC, former head of the government legal service, to conduct an independent external review of how MI5 came to provide false evidence to the courts. The investigation will examine MI5's procedures and recommend changes to ensure courts receive accurate information from the Security Service in future cases involving national security matters.

The case has raised broader concerns about MI5's credibility in court proceedings where judges typically give "enormous weight and deference" to Security Service evidence, often in secret hearings closed to affected parties. Legal experts warn the false testimony could undermine trust in MI5's evidence across multiple ongoing cases involving national security, citizenship stripping, and counterterrorism matters.</span

The case has raised broader concerns about MI5's credibility in court proceedings where judges typically give "enormous weight and deference" to Security Service evidence, often in secret hearings closed to affected parties. Legal experts warn the false testimony could undermine trust in MI5's evidence across multiple ongoing cases involving national security, citizenship stripping, and counterterrorism matters.

This scandal exposes the dangerous lack of accountability within MI5 when protecting violent agents. The Security Service repeatedly lied to courts to shield a neo-Nazi who terrorized women, showing how institutional secrecy enables abuse. When caught red-handed with recordings, they still tried to minimize responsibility.

This scandal exposes the dangerous lack of accountability within MI5 when protecting violent agents. The Security Service repeatedly lied to courts to shield a neo-Nazi who terrorized women, showing how institutional secrecy enables abuse. When caught red-handed with recordings, they still tried to minimize responsibility.

Politpro

Netherlands: Polls and trends for the 2027 election

MI5's errors, while serious, appear to stem from communication breakdowns and poor record-keeping rather than deliberate deception, as the agency's own investigation concluded. The Security Service operates in an incredibly complex environment where protecting agent identities is crucial for national security and preventing terrorist attacks. These procedural failures shouldn't overshadow MI5's vital work in keeping the country safe from genuine threats.

MI5's errors, while serious, appear to stem from communication breakdowns and poor record-keeping rather than deliberate deception, as the agency's own investigation concluded. The Security Service operates in an incredibly complex environment where protecting agent identities is crucial for national security and preventing terrorist attacks. These procedural failures shouldn't overshadow MI5's vital work in keeping the country safe from genuine threats.

MI5's apology demonstrates the agency takes accountability seriously when errors occur. The false evidence resulted from communication failures and poor record-keeping, not deliberate deception. Internal investigations found no intentional misleading, and disciplinary measures show the seriousness of maintaining court credibility.

MI5's apology demonstrates the agency takes accountability seriously when errors occur. The false evidence resulted from communication failures and poor record-keeping, not deliberate deception. Internal investigations found no intentional misleading, and disciplinary measures show the seriousness of maintaining court credibility.

MI5 Apologizes for Lying to Courts About Neo-Nazi Agent

Court system

Crime & justice

Espionage

Governance

Media

United Kingdom

World

MI5 plays a vital role in keeping the U.K. safe from terrorism and state threats, often under immense pressure. However, providing incorrect information to the courts, especially in cases involving serious allegations, is unacceptable. It’s right that an independent review has been launched to ensure transparency, accountability, and that such failures are not repeated.

MI5 plays a vital role in keeping the U.K. safe from terrorism and state threats, often under immense pressure. However, providing incorrect information to the courts, especially in cases involving serious allegations, is unacceptable. It’s right that an independent review has been launched to ensure transparency, accountability, and that such failures are not repeated.

This scandal exposes the dangerous culture of secrecy and unaccountability within MI5 that allows agents to abuse their positions without consequence. MI5's willingness to lie repeatedly to multiple courts shows a complete disregard for the rule of law and judicial oversight. This revelation undermines the very foundation of the U.K.'s legal system and democratic accountability.

This scandal exposes the dangerous culture of secrecy and unaccountability within MI5 that allows agents to abuse their positions without consequence. MI5's willingness to lie repeatedly to multiple courts shows a complete disregard for the rule of law and judicial oversight. This revelation undermines the very foundation of the U.K.'s legal system and democratic accountability.

MI5 Offers 'Unreserved' Apology to High Court For False Evidence in Neo-Nazi Case

MI5 ApologizesOffers for'Unreserved' LyingApology to CourtsHigh AboutCourt For False Evidence in Neo-Nazi AgentCase

The Spin

Articles on this story

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters

MI5 Offers 'Unreserved' Apology to High Court For False Evidence in Neo-Nazi Case

MI5 ApologizesOffers for'Unreserved' LyingApology to CourtsHigh AboutCourt For False Evidence in Neo-Nazi AgentCase

The Spin

Articles on this story

Sign Up for Our Free NewslettersSign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters