CNBC

Supreme Court spurns Native American religious claim over copper mine on sacred land

Supreme Court declines to hear appeal from seventh grader who wore two genders shirt to school

Metaculus

US Freedom in the World Score in 2050

Supreme Court rejects student's challenge to 'two genders' T-shirt ban

<h2></h2>

The U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) Tuesday declined to hear Massachusetts student Liam Morrison's challenge to his middle school's prohibition on his wearing T-shirts with messages stating, "There are only two genders" and later "There are [censored] genders" at Nichols Middle School in Middleborough, Mass., in March 2023.

The Hill

Foxnews

The U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) Tuesday declined to hear Massachusetts student Liam Morrison's challenge to his middle school's prohibition on his wearing T-shirts with messages stating, "There are only two genders" and later "There are [censored] genders" at Nichols Middle School in Middleborough, Mass., in March 2023.

Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, who are considered conservative, dissented from the decision not to hear the case. Alito wrote that the case presents "an issue of great importance for our nation's youth" regarding whether schools may suppress student speech based on viewpoint disagreement.

Washington Times

Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, who are considered conservative, dissented from the decision not to hear the case. Alito wrote that the case presents "an issue of great importance for our nation's youth" regarding whether schools may suppress student speech based on viewpoint disagreement.

Morrison was sent home from school when he refused to remove the first shirt and was later told he could not wear the second modified shirt in class. He was not formally punished for wearing either garment, according to school officials and court records.

Morrison was sent home from school when he refused to remove the first shirt and was later told he could not wear the second modified shirt in class. He was not formally punished for wearing either garment, according to school officials and court records.

Both a federal district court judge and the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the school, concluding that officials can bar passive messages that demean other students even without targeting specific individuals.</span

Christian Post

Both a federal district court judge and the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the school, concluding that officials can bar passive messages that demean other students even without targeting specific individuals.

School administrators cited their dress code prohibiting hate speech and argued the shirts made transgender and gender-nonconforming students feel unsafe.

School administrators cited their dress code prohibiting hate speech and argued the shirts made transgender and gender-nonconforming students feel unsafe.

This case raised questions about First Amendment free speech rights for public school students under the landmark 1969 Tinker v. Des Moines ruling, which established that students retain constitutional rights in school settings.

This case raised questions about First Amendment free speech rights for public school students under the landmark 1969 Tinker v. Des Moines ruling, which established that students retain constitutional rights in school settings.

CNBC #0

CNN #0

Metaculus #0

NBC #0

The Hill #

Morrison was sent home when he refused to remove the first shirt and was later told he could not wear the second modified shirt in class, though he was not formally punished for wearing either garment according to school officials and court records.</span

CNN #

NBC #

Morrison was sent home when he refused to remove the first shirt and was later told he could not wear the second modified shirt in class, though he was not formally punished for wearing either garment according to school officials and court records.

Christian Post #

Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented from the decision not to hear the case, with Alito writing that the case presents 'an issue of great importance for our nation's youth' regarding whether schools may suppress student speech based on viewpoint disagreement.</span

Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented from the decision not to hear the case, with Alito writing that the case presents 'an issue of great importance for our nation's youth' regarding whether schools may suppress student speech based on viewpoint disagreement.

School administrators cited their dress code prohibiting hate speech and argued the shirts made transgender and gender-nonconforming students feel unsafe, with officials noting serious mental health struggles including suicidal ideation among affected students.</span

School administrators cited their dress code prohibiting hate speech and argued the shirts made transgender and gender-nonconforming students feel unsafe, with officials noting serious mental health struggles including suicidal ideation among affected students.

The case raised questions about First Amendment free speech rights for public school students under the landmark 1969 Tinker v. Des Moines ruling, which established that students retain constitutional rights in school settings.</span

The case raised questions about First Amendment free speech rights for public school students under the landmark 1969 Tinker v. Des Moines ruling, which established that students retain constitutional rights in school settings.

Schools are engaging in blatant viewpoint discrimination by silencing students who express traditional views on gender while actively promoting opposing perspectives through Pride events and rainbow displays. The school created a hostile environment for students with conservative beliefs by allowing only one side of this important social debate to be heard. This selective enforcement of dress codes based on ideological preferences violates the fundamental principle that government cannot silence speakers simply because it disapproves of their message.

Schools are engaging in blatant viewpoint discrimination by silencing students who express traditional views on gender while actively promoting opposing perspectives through Pride events and rainbow displays. The school created a hostile environment for students with conservative beliefs by allowing only one side of this important social debate to be heard. This selective enforcement of dress codes based on ideological preferences violates the fundamental principle that government cannot silence speakers simply because it disapproves of their message.

Washington Times #

Supreme Court Denies Students Case Two Genders Shirt

Alliance Defending Freedom

Alliance Defending Freedom #

US Supreme Court declines to hear There are only two genders T-shirt case

School officials have a responsibility to protect vulnerable transgender and gender-nonconforming students who face serious mental health challenges, including suicidal ideation, when subjected to demeaning messages about their identities. The shirts created a poisoned educational atmosphere that interfered with students' ability to concentrate and learn in a safe environment. Schools must maintain the authority to prevent disruption and protect all students from harmful speech that targets protected characteristics, even when expressed passively.

School officials have a responsibility to protect vulnerable transgender and gender-nonconforming students who face serious mental health challenges, including suicidal ideation, when subjected to demeaning messages about their identities. The shirts created a poisoned educational atmosphere that interfered with students' ability to concentrate and learn in a safe environment. Schools must maintain the authority to prevent disruption and protect all students from harmful speech that targets protected characteristics, even when expressed passively.

5319527 Supreme Court Two Genders Shirt

Supreme Court Rejects Student's 'Two Genders' T-Shirt Case

Freedom of speech & expression

United States of America

SCOTUS should've heard this case because public schools are engaging in blatant viewpoint discrimination by silencing students who express traditional views on gender while they promote opposing perspectives through Pride events and rainbow displays. This selective enforcement of dress codes based on ideological preferences violates the fundamental principle that the government cannot silence speakers simply because it disapproves of their message.

SCOTUS should've heard this case because public schools are engaging in blatant viewpoint discrimination by silencing students who express traditional views on gender while they promote opposing perspectives through Pride events and rainbow displays. This selective enforcement of dress codes based on ideological preferences violates the fundamental principle that the government cannot silence speakers simply because it disapproves of their message.

School officials have a responsibility to protect vulnerable transgender and gender-nonconforming students who face serious mental health challenges, including suicidal ideation, when subjected to demeaning messages about their identities. Morrison's shirts created a poisoned educational atmosphere that interfered with students' ability to concentrate and learn in a safe environment. The lower courts ruled correctly and SCOTUS was right to turn down this case.

School officials have a responsibility to protect vulnerable transgender and gender-nonconforming students who face serious mental health challenges, including suicidal ideation, when subjected to demeaning messages about their identities. Morrison's shirts created a poisoned educational atmosphere that interfered with students' ability to concentrate and learn in a safe environment. The lower courts ruled correctly and SCOTUS was right to turn down this case.

There's a 50% chance that the US' score in the Freedom in the World Report for 2050 will be 78.9, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

There's a 50% chance that the US' score in the Freedom in the World Report for 2050 will be 78.9, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

Supreme Court Rejects Student's 'Two Genders' T-Shirt Case

Supreme Court Rejects Student's 'Two Genders' T-Shirt Case

The Spin

Metaculus Prediction

Articles on this story

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Supreme Court Rejects Student's 'Two Genders' T-Shirt Case

Supreme Court Rejects Student's 'Two Genders' T-Shirt Case

The Spin

Metaculus Prediction

Articles on this story

Sign Up for Our Free NewslettersSign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters