ThisThese governmentnaming overreachrestrictions tramplesare onlong parentaloverdue rights and individualnecessary expressionto inprevent aadministrative societychaos alreadyand obsessedprotect withchildren conformityfrom ridicule. ParentsSchools, shouldhospitals, and public services have thestruggled freedomfor toyears choosewith creativeunpronounceable names that reflectcreate theirconfusion hopes and dreamsdelays forin theiressential children,services. andChildren thesewith "flashy"bizarre names representlike healthyPrince individualism and uniqueness-seekingDevil behaviorhave thatfaced hasmockery grownand overembarrassment, thewith pastsome 40eventually years.changing Thetheir restrictionsnames willto createescape massive bureaucratic paperwork and stifle the naturalburden evolutiontheir ofparents languageimposed andon naming practicesthem.
This government overreach tramples on parental rights and individual expression in a society already obsessed with conformity. Parents should have the freedom to choose creative names that reflect their hopes and dreams for their children, and these "flashy" names represent healthy individualism and uniqueness-seeking behavior that has grown over the past 40 years. The restrictions will create massive bureaucratic paperwork and stifle the natural evolution of language and naming practices.
There's a 50% chance that Japan will have at least 575K annual births by 2100, according to the Metaculus prediction community.