The severity of Nadon's crimes and their impact on victims cannot be understated. His actions represented a fundamental breach of trust between doctor and patient, causing lasting psychological trauma. The university's alleged failure to act on early complaints in 1995 allowed the abuse to continue for decades, demonstrating institutional negligence that demands accountability.
The victims' claims appear exaggerated and emotionaltheir responses appeardisproportionate exaggeratedto beyond the actual harm inflicted. Many would not have known they were victims if not for police notification, andsuggesting sometheir allegationstrauma seemwas indistinguishablelargely fromself-generated. standardThe medicalsevere procedures.punishment Theand massive financial demandssettlement from the university seem disproportionateexcessive for actions nothat, institutionwhile couldunprofessional, reasonablycaused preventno physical harm.
The victims' claims and emotional responses appear exaggerated beyond the actual harm inflicted. Many would not have known they were victims if not for police notification, and some allegations seem indistinguishable from standard medical procedures. The massive financial demands from the university seem disproportionate for actions no institution could reasonably prevent.