The victimsseverity of Nadon's claimscrimes and emotionaltheir responsesimpact appearon exaggeratedvictims beyondcannot thebe actualunderstated. harmHis inflicted.actions Manyrepresented woulda notfundamental havebreach knownof theytrust werebetween victimsdoctor ifand notpatient, forcausing policelasting notification,psychological andtrauma. someThe allegationsuniversity's seemalleged indistinguishablefailure fromto standardact medicalon procedures.early Thecomplaints massivein financial1995 demandsallowed from the universityabuse seemto disproportionatecontinue for actionsdecades, nodemonstrating institutioninstitutional couldnegligence reasonablythat preventdemands accountability.
The victims' claims and emotional responses appear exaggerated beyond the actual harm inflicted. Many would not have known they were victims if not for police notification, and some allegations seem indistinguishable from standard medical procedures. The massive financial demands from the university seem disproportionate for actions no institution could reasonably prevent.