Haigh's resignation is a sad loss for Labour. Her work on renationalizing the railways and fighting for workers' rights was transformative, yet a decade-old mistake has overshadowed her achievements. It's hard not to see this as disproportionate — a young woman who was mugged made a genuine error, and disclosed the years-old discretion. Instead of supporting a proven leader, the government let pressure and optics force her out. Labour is weaker without her in the Cabinet, and it will not be long until we see her return to frontline politics.

Starmer's judgment is under scrutiny after Haigh's resignation. Despite knowing about her conviction when appointing her, Starmer allowed her to hold a critical cabinet role until public exposure forced her to step down. This raises questions about his leadership and commitment to transparency. If a conviction is disqualifying now, why wasn't it when she was appointed? Starmer's inconsistency undermines trust in his administration, suggesting political convenience outweighs accountability in his decision-making.