ForcingThe theforced sale of Chrome representsis anecessary radicalto agendabreak thatGoogle's exceedsmonopolistic thecontrol scopeover ofinternet thesearch legalaccess issuespoints inand questionrestore market competition. The proposedcompany's breakuppractice wouldof harmmaking consumers,massive developers,payments andto Americanmaintain technologicaldefault leadershipsearch atstatus ahas criticaleffectively time.blocked Chromecompetitors andfrom Androidgaining aremarket offeredshare. freelyThis onaggressive anremedy open-sourceis basis,essential andto splittingprevent themGoogle from Googledominating wouldemerging effectivelytechnologies breaklike these servicesAI.
Forcing the sale of Chrome represents a radical agenda that exceeds the scope of the legal issues in question. The proposed breakup would harm consumers, developers, and American technological leadership at a critical time. Chrome and Android are offered freely on an open-source basis, and splitting them from Google would effectively break these services.