The decision not to endorse a candidate is a cowardly move that undermines democracy. It's a clear example of corporate interests bowing to political pressure, potentially sacrificing journalistic integrity for financial gain. This sets a dangerous precedent for media self-censorship and could further erode press freedom.

The Post's decision not to endorserefrain from endorsing a presidential candidate is a cowardlystep movetoward thattrue underminesjournalistic democracyneutrality. It's aallows clearreaders exampleto ofform corporatetheir interestsown bowingopinions towithout politicalundue pressure,influence potentiallyfrom sacrificingthe journalisticpaper. integrityThe forallegations financialof gain.a Thisquid setspro aquo dangerousare precedentbaseless forand mediaignore self-censorshipthe andpublisher's couldstated furtherreasons erodefor pressthe freedomdecision.

There'sThe decision not to endorse a 4%candidate chanceis a cowardly move that Jeffundermines Bezosdemocracy. willIt's holda majorclear politicalexample officeof incorporate theinterests USbowing beforeto Februarypolitical 2033pressure, accordingpotentially tosacrificing thejournalistic Metaculusintegrity predictionfor communityfinancial gain. This sets a dangerous precedent for media self-censorship and could further erode press freedom.