AlterNet

Former WaPo editor reveals 'proof' of Trump’s 'backroom deal' with Amazon founder: report

Guardian

Bezos faces criticism after executives met with Trump on day of Post’s non-endorsement

Asa Hutchinson

J. Michael Luttig

Steven Calabresi

Eric Foner

Steven Cheung

Robert A. Levy

Ilya Somin

Center for American Progress

"We are confident that the fair-minded Supreme Court will unanimously affirm the civil rights of President Trump, and the voting rights of all Americans."

"[T]he legal arguments against disqualification are ultimately unsound, and most are very weak."

"[M]y bet is that... even the liberal justices will lean toward allowing voters to decide whether Trump is fit to be president."

Barring Trump from public office "would be the mildest of punishments."

The Jan. 6 riot "is something that could disqualify him, under our rules, and under the constitution."

"The former president's efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election, and the resulting attack on the US Capitol, place him squarely within the ambit of the disqualification clause."

"[A] plain and fair reading of Section 3... demonstrates that Trump is constitutionally disqualified from holding future public office."

"I think it's really actually very clearcut... [Section 3 is] in general language, and so it applies to anyone who incites an insurrection or rebellion."

Will Donald Trump Be Disqualified From Holding the Presidency?

Former Washington Post editor-at-large Robert Kagan resigned following the non-endorsement decision and alleged a quid pro quo agreement between Bezos and Donald Trump to prevent the paper from endorsing Kamala Harris.

New York Post

Kagan pointed to a meeting between Trump and executives from Bezos' Blue Origin space company on the same day as the non-endorsement announcement as evidence of the alleged deal.

The decision not to endorse a candidate has led to significant backlash, including criticism from former and current employees, as well as a reported 2,000 subscription cancellations within 24 hours.

Washington Post publisher Will Lewis defended the decision, claiming it was his own and not influenced by Bezos, stating that he does not believe in presidential endorsements.

The controversy has raised concerns about potential self-censorship in media and the influence of corporate interests on journalistic independence, particularly in the context of the upcoming presidential election.

AlterNet #1920

Guardian #5327

US Electoral System Overview

US Election: Trump v. Harris Pledges

Allegations of Trump-Bezos Backroom Deal

Media

Politics

United States of America

The Washington Post's decision to refrain from endorsing a presidential candidate is a step towards true journalistic neutrality. It allows readers to form their own opinions without undue influence from the paper. The allegations of a quid pro quo are baseless and ignore the publisher's stated reasons for the decision.

Ex-WaPo editor claims Jeff Bezos colluded with Trump to kill Harris endorsement: ‘Quid-pro-quo’

Bezos-Trump Deal Alleged in WaPo Endorsement Controversy

AllegationsBezos-Trump ofDeal Trump-BezosAlleged Backroomin DealWaPo Endorsement Controversy

The Spin

The Controversies

Cheung

Somin

Levy

Foner

Hutchinson

Luttig

Progress

Calabresi

Go Deeper

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters