Versions :<123456789Live>
Snapshot 3:Tue, Oct 8, 2024 6:10:13 PM GMT last edited by MattKalman

Supreme Court Rejects X's Appeal in Trump Data Case

Supreme Court Rejects X's Appeal in Trump Data Case

Image copyright: 

The Spin

ThisThe rulinggovernment's setsactions awere dangerousnecessary precedentto forprevent privacypotential destruction of evidence and privilege.protect Thethe governmentintegrity canof nowthe potentiallyinvestigation. invadeThe attorney-client,courts journalist-source,were andright doctor-patientto privilegesprioritize withoutnational notice.security Itconcerns over X's anFirst unprecedentedAmendment end-runclaims. aroundThis executivedecision privilegesets thata couldprecedent have far-reaching consequences for allfuture userscases ofinvolving socialhigh-profile media platformsinvestigations.

This ruling sets a dangerous precedent for privacy and privilege. The government can now potentially invade attorney-client, journalist-source, and doctor-patient privileges without notice. It's an unprecedented end-run around executive privilege that could have far-reaching consequences for all users of social media platforms.


The Controversies



Go Deeper


Articles on this story

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Sign Up!
Sign Up Now!