Supreme Court Rejects X's Appeal in Trump Data Case
Supreme Court Rejects X's Appeal in Trump Data Case
The Facts
Smith obtained a court-authorized warrant in January 2023 for information associated with Trump's @realDonaldTrump account as part of the election interference probe.The Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from X Corp. regarding special counsel Jack Smith's acquisition of former President Donald Trump's Twitter records.
X (formerly Twitter) was initially prohibited from disclosing the warrant to Trump for 180 days and was fined $350,000 for failing to hand over the records on time.Smith obtained a court-authorized warrant in January 2023 for information associated with Trump's @realDonaldTrump account as part of the election interference probe.
The Spin
ThisThe rulinggovernment's setsactions awere dangerousnecessary precedentto forprevent privacypotential destruction of evidence and privilege.protect Thethe governmentintegrity canof nowthe potentiallyinvestigation. invadeThe attorney-client,courts journalist-source,were andright doctor-patientto privilegesprioritize withoutnational notice.security Itconcerns over X's anFirst unprecedentedAmendment end-runclaims. aroundThis executivedecision privilegesets thata couldprecedent have far-reaching consequences for allfuture userscases ofinvolving socialhigh-profile media platformsinvestigations.
This ruling sets a dangerous precedent for privacy and privilege. The government can now potentially invade attorney-client, journalist-source, and doctor-patient privileges without notice. It's an unprecedented end-run around executive privilege that could have far-reaching consequences for all users of social media platforms.
