Though this reckless and populist policy may sellplay well in media discourse, such measures infringe on children's right to expression and exclude young minds from meaningful, healthy engagement in the digital world. This ban could also inadvertently drive struggling teenagers to hide their social interactions using VPNsvirtual private networks, seek help secretly, or drive dangerous online activity underground, exacerbating the dangers. Last but not least, it would let tech giants off the hook in making necessary reforms to the quality of content on their platforms.

Guardian

There's nothing "social" about social media. Children must play real games on the field, make friends in real -time, and have real experiences with the real world. Australia isn't takingmaking an out-of-the-worldabsurd, unprecedented decision. China, France, and several states in the US have restricted minors' social media use to protect them from mental harm. Albanese is committed to giving parents the power to push back against social media platformscorporations and force tech giants to ban teenagers from their platforms or face penalties.

Time

This is a complex issue, and there are better solutions than cutting off access to social media. Countries that have imposed age limits have difficulty enforcing the measures as there are numerous ways users can circumvent the restrictions. To protect the country’Australia's children, the government must develop high-quality experiences online for children of all ages, equip parents with the tools to support their teenagers, and probably place tobacco-style warning labels on social media to alert users.

Washington Post