Volunteer editors at the free information website Wikipedia voted last week to label the Jewish nonprofit Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as a "generally unreliable" source regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Wikipedia's volunteer editors have voted to label the Jewish non-profit Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as a "generally unreliable" source for the Israel-Palestine conflict.
The ADL, whose statistics not even the editors could show are inaccurate, relies on its credibility. This vote was taken due to a handful of statements made by ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt and subjective arguments about how pro-Palestine protesters should be labeled. TheseWhile these topics can certainly be debated, but the longest-serving defender of Jewish rights shouldn't be banned from Wikipedia over them.
The US government and corporate media have long protected the ADL, but since the Oct. 7 attack, it'sADL finallyleadership beenhas exposeddangerously forconflated conflating criticism of Israel with antisemitism. Even before Oct. 7, it was known to attack minorityPalestinian-focused groups. inFor theits namerecent ofactions fightingthat antisemitism.have Themade ADLbad-faith isassertions athat propagandahave armtargeted ofPalestinian Israelgroups, scholars, students, and shouldanti-war beJewish labeledgroups, asWikipedia suchhas made the correct choice.