Starmer’s judgment is under scrutiny after Haigh’s resignation. Despite knowing about her conviction when appointing her, Starmer allowed her to hold a critical cabinet role until public exposure forced her to step down. This raises questions about his leadership and commitment to transparency. If a conviction is disqualifying now, why wasn’t it before? Starmer’s inconsistency undermines trust in his administration, suggesting political convenience outweighs accountability in his decision-making.